From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC] nl80211: use policy range validation where applicable
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 22:09:43 +0200
Message-ID: <1537992583.28767.24.camel@sipsolutions.net>
References: <20180926200630.23399-1-johannes@sipsolutions.net>
         <20180926200731.23491-1-johannes@sipsolutions.net>
         (sfid-20180926_220807_433903_259DD5BE)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([144.76.43.62]:46012 "EHLO
        sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1726395AbeI0CYe (ORCPT
        <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Wed, 26 Sep 2018 22:24:34 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20180926200731.23491-1-johannes@sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20180926_220807_433903_259DD5BE)
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

On Wed, 2018-09-26 at 22:07 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
> 
> Many range checks can be done in the policy, move them
> there. A few in mesh are added in the code (taken out of
> the macros) because they don't fit into the s16 range in
> the policy validation.

Forgot to say - this saves 550 bytes of .text on x86-64 for me.

johannes