From: Wenwen Wang <wang6495@umn.edu>
To: Wenwen Wang <wang6495@umn.edu>
Cc: Kangjie Lu <kjlu@umn.edu>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org (open list:NETWORKING [GENERAL]),
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: [PATCH] net: socket: fix a missing-check bug
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 09:36:46 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1539873406-5967-1-git-send-email-wang6495@umn.edu> (raw)
In ethtool_ioctl(), the ioctl command 'ethcmd' is checked through a switch
statement to see whether it is necessary to pre-process the ethtool
structure, because, as mentioned in the comment, the structure
ethtool_rxnfc is defined with padding. If yes, a user-space buffer 'rxnfc'
is allocated through compat_alloc_user_space(). One thing to note here is
that, if 'ethcmd' is ETHTOOL_GRXCLSRLALL, the size of the buffer 'rxnfc' is
partially determined by 'rule_cnt', which is actually acquired from the
user-space buffer 'compat_rxnfc', i.e., 'compat_rxnfc->rule_cnt', through
get_user(). After 'rxnfc' is allocated, the data in the original user-space
buffer 'compat_rxnfc' is then copied to 'rxnfc' through copy_in_user(),
including the 'rule_cnt' field. However, after this copy, no check is
re-enforced on 'rxnfc->rule_cnt'. So it is possible that a malicious user
race to change the value in the 'compat_rxnfc->rule_cnt' between these two
copies. Through this way, the attacker can bypass the previous check on
'rule_cnt' and inject malicious data. This can cause undefined behavior of
the kernel and introduce potential security risk.
This patch avoids the above issue via copying the value acquired by
get_user() to 'rxnfc->rule_cn', if 'ethcmd' is ETHTOOL_GRXCLSRLALL.
Signed-off-by: Wenwen Wang <wang6495@umn.edu>
---
net/socket.c | 11 ++++++++---
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c
index 01f3f8f..390a8ec 100644
--- a/net/socket.c
+++ b/net/socket.c
@@ -2875,9 +2875,14 @@ static int ethtool_ioctl(struct net *net, struct compat_ifreq __user *ifr32)
copy_in_user(&rxnfc->fs.ring_cookie,
&compat_rxnfc->fs.ring_cookie,
(void __user *)(&rxnfc->fs.location + 1) -
- (void __user *)&rxnfc->fs.ring_cookie) ||
- copy_in_user(&rxnfc->rule_cnt, &compat_rxnfc->rule_cnt,
- sizeof(rxnfc->rule_cnt)))
+ (void __user *)&rxnfc->fs.ring_cookie))
+ return -EFAULT;
+ if (ethcmd == ETHTOOL_GRXCLSRLALL) {
+ if (put_user(rule_cnt, &rxnfc->rule_cnt))
+ return -EFAULT;
+ } else if (copy_in_user(&rxnfc->rule_cnt,
+ &compat_rxnfc->rule_cnt,
+ sizeof(rxnfc->rule_cnt)))
return -EFAULT;
}
--
2.7.4
next reply other threads:[~2018-10-18 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-18 14:36 Wenwen Wang [this message]
2018-10-18 23:43 ` [PATCH] net: socket: fix a missing-check bug David Miller
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-10-20 15:58 Wenwen Wang
2018-10-21 3:21 ` Florian Fainelli
2018-10-29 18:53 ` Wenwen Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1539873406-5967-1-git-send-email-wang6495@umn.edu \
--to=wang6495@umn.edu \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kjlu@umn.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).