[RFC bpf-next 7/7] selftests: bpf: update testcases for BPF_ALU | BPF_ARSH

[Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>]

"arsh32 on imm" and "arsh32 on reg" now are accepted. Also added two new
testcases to make sure arsh32 won't be treated as arsh64 during
interpretation or JIT code-gen for which case the high bits will be moved
into low halve that the testcases could catch them.

Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
index 18d0b7f..e7f1bc7 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -721,8 +721,18 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 			BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_0, 5),
 			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
 		},
-		.result = REJECT,
-		.errstr = "unknown opcode c4",
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.retval = 0,
+	},
+	{
+		"arsh32 on imm 2",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_0, 0x1122334485667788),
+			BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_0, 7),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.retval = -16069393,
 	},
 	{
 		"arsh32 on reg",
@@ -732,8 +742,19 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 			BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
 			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
 		},
-		.result = REJECT,
-		.errstr = "unknown opcode cc",
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.retval = 0,
+	},
+	{
+		"arsh32 on reg 2",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_0, 0xffff55667788),
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 15),
+			BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_ARSH, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.retval = 43724,
 	},
 	{
 		"arsh64 on imm",
-- 
2.7.4