From: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
To: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net
Cc: jakub.kicinski@netronome.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
oss-drivers@netronome.com, Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] nfp: bpf: complete ALU32 logic shift supports
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2019 22:39:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1549060769-20920-3-git-send-email-jiong.wang@netronome.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1549060769-20920-1-git-send-email-jiong.wang@netronome.com>
The following ALU32 logic shift supports are missing:
BPF_ALU | BPF_LSH | BPF_X
BPF_ALU | BPF_RSH | BPF_X
BPF_ALU | BPF_RSH | BPF_K
For BPF_RSH | BPF_K, it could be implemented using NFP direct shift
instruction. For the other BPF_X shifts, NFP indirect shifts sequences need
to be used.
Separate code-gen hook is assigned to each instruction to make the
implementation clear.
Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/jit.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/jit.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/jit.c
index 093b8ff..4d9d380 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/jit.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/jit.c
@@ -2441,16 +2441,75 @@ static int ashr_imm(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
return __ashr_imm(nfp_prog, dst, insn->imm);
}
+static int __shr_imm(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, u8 dst, u8 shift_amt)
+{
+ if (shift_amt)
+ emit_shf(nfp_prog, reg_both(dst), reg_none(), SHF_OP_NONE,
+ reg_b(dst), SHF_SC_R_SHF, shift_amt);
+ wrp_immed(nfp_prog, reg_both(dst + 1), 0);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int shr_imm(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
+{
+ const struct bpf_insn *insn = &meta->insn;
+ u8 dst = insn->dst_reg * 2;
+
+ return __shr_imm(nfp_prog, dst, insn->imm);
+}
+
+static int shr_reg(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
+{
+ const struct bpf_insn *insn = &meta->insn;
+ u64 umin, umax;
+ u8 dst, src;
+
+ dst = insn->dst_reg * 2;
+ umin = meta->umin_src;
+ umax = meta->umax_src;
+ if (umin == umax)
+ return __shr_imm(nfp_prog, dst, umin);
+
+ src = insn->src_reg * 2;
+ emit_alu(nfp_prog, reg_none(), reg_a(src), ALU_OP_OR, reg_imm(0));
+ emit_shf_indir(nfp_prog, reg_both(dst), reg_none(), SHF_OP_NONE,
+ reg_b(dst), SHF_SC_R_SHF);
+ wrp_immed(nfp_prog, reg_both(dst + 1), 0);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int __shl_imm(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, u8 dst, u8 shift_amt)
+{
+ if (shift_amt)
+ emit_shf(nfp_prog, reg_both(dst), reg_none(), SHF_OP_NONE,
+ reg_b(dst), SHF_SC_L_SHF, shift_amt);
+ wrp_immed(nfp_prog, reg_both(dst + 1), 0);
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int shl_imm(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
{
const struct bpf_insn *insn = &meta->insn;
+ u8 dst = insn->dst_reg * 2;
- if (insn->imm)
- emit_shf(nfp_prog, reg_both(insn->dst_reg * 2),
- reg_none(), SHF_OP_NONE, reg_b(insn->dst_reg * 2),
- SHF_SC_L_SHF, insn->imm);
- wrp_immed(nfp_prog, reg_both(insn->dst_reg * 2 + 1), 0);
+ return __shl_imm(nfp_prog, dst, insn->imm);
+}
+static int shl_reg(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta)
+{
+ const struct bpf_insn *insn = &meta->insn;
+ u64 umin, umax;
+ u8 dst, src;
+
+ dst = insn->dst_reg * 2;
+ umin = meta->umin_src;
+ umax = meta->umax_src;
+ if (umin == umax)
+ return __shl_imm(nfp_prog, dst, umin);
+
+ src = insn->src_reg * 2;
+ shl_reg64_lt32_low(nfp_prog, dst, src);
+ wrp_immed(nfp_prog, reg_both(dst + 1), 0);
return 0;
}
@@ -3360,7 +3419,10 @@ static const instr_cb_t instr_cb[256] = {
[BPF_ALU | BPF_DIV | BPF_X] = div_reg,
[BPF_ALU | BPF_DIV | BPF_K] = div_imm,
[BPF_ALU | BPF_NEG] = neg_reg,
+ [BPF_ALU | BPF_LSH | BPF_X] = shl_reg,
[BPF_ALU | BPF_LSH | BPF_K] = shl_imm,
+ [BPF_ALU | BPF_RSH | BPF_X] = shr_reg,
+ [BPF_ALU | BPF_RSH | BPF_K] = shr_imm,
[BPF_ALU | BPF_ARSH | BPF_X] = ashr_reg,
[BPF_ALU | BPF_ARSH | BPF_K] = ashr_imm,
[BPF_ALU | BPF_END | BPF_X] = end_reg32,
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-01 22:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-01 22:39 [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] nfp: bpf: shifts support cleanups Jiong Wang
2019-02-01 22:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] nfp: bpf: correct the behavior for shifts by zero Jiong Wang
2019-02-01 22:39 ` Jiong Wang [this message]
2019-02-02 5:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] nfp: bpf: shifts support cleanups Alexei Starovoitov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1549060769-20920-3-git-send-email-jiong.wang@netronome.com \
--to=jiong.wang@netronome.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oss-drivers@netronome.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).