netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@data.slu.se>
To: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
Cc: Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@data.slu.se>,
	Chris Friesen <cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com>, <netdev@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: suggestion for routing code improvement
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 15:01:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <15541.35087.61146.809057@robur.slu.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0204111451570.9056-100000@l>



Hello!

Julian Anastasov writes:
 > 
 > 	Well, I now see, it is used in gated. But only in one route table
 > which is a drawback.
 
 gated netlink code came from Alexey. I had to adjust the preference for 
 "static" in gated to get the desired effect.
 
 > 
 > 	More correctly, the settings are more complex than the mentioned
 > daemons can handle. Sticking with one route table is not enough in most
 > of the cases. This is the main reason the mentioned patches for static
 > routes to exist. They are more manageable (with scripts) for setups where
 > routing protocols are not used.

 Well we can be happy for the well-designed routing/netlink system Linux 
 got and as you say routing software does not yet fully utilize this. 
 But I think we agree that we shouldn't have kernel to compensate for this.

 I did some benchmarking/profiling on the routing lookup/cache/garbage 
 collection it seems to be well done too. Having listened to all fuzz 
 about routing lookups at GIGE speeds. :-)

 Cheers.

						--ro

  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-04-11 13:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-04-10 17:51 suggestion for routing code improvement Chris Friesen
2002-04-10 18:53 ` Andi Kleen
2002-04-10 20:15 ` Robert Olsson
2002-04-10 20:56   ` Chris Friesen
2002-04-10 23:02     ` Robert Olsson
2002-04-11  2:24       ` Julian Anastasov
2002-04-11 11:29         ` Robert Olsson
2002-04-11 12:08           ` Julian Anastasov
2002-04-11 12:18             ` jamal
2002-04-11 12:58               ` Julian Anastasov
2002-04-11 13:05                 ` jamal
2002-04-11 13:01             ` Robert Olsson [this message]
2002-04-11 13:06               ` Julian Anastasov
2002-04-11 14:53                 ` Robert Olsson
2002-04-11 15:24                   ` Julian Anastasov
2002-04-11 16:05                     ` Robert Olsson
2002-04-10 21:37 ` Julian Anastasov
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-04-10 20:41 Nivedita Singhvi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=15541.35087.61146.809057@robur.slu.se \
    --to=robert.olsson@data.slu.se \
    --cc=cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com \
    --cc=ja@ssi.bg \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).