From: Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@data.slu.se>
To: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
Cc: Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@data.slu.se>,
Chris Friesen <cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com>, <netdev@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: suggestion for routing code improvement
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 15:01:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15541.35087.61146.809057@robur.slu.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0204111451570.9056-100000@l>
Hello!
Julian Anastasov writes:
>
> Well, I now see, it is used in gated. But only in one route table
> which is a drawback.
gated netlink code came from Alexey. I had to adjust the preference for
"static" in gated to get the desired effect.
>
> More correctly, the settings are more complex than the mentioned
> daemons can handle. Sticking with one route table is not enough in most
> of the cases. This is the main reason the mentioned patches for static
> routes to exist. They are more manageable (with scripts) for setups where
> routing protocols are not used.
Well we can be happy for the well-designed routing/netlink system Linux
got and as you say routing software does not yet fully utilize this.
But I think we agree that we shouldn't have kernel to compensate for this.
I did some benchmarking/profiling on the routing lookup/cache/garbage
collection it seems to be well done too. Having listened to all fuzz
about routing lookups at GIGE speeds. :-)
Cheers.
--ro
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-11 13:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-10 17:51 suggestion for routing code improvement Chris Friesen
2002-04-10 18:53 ` Andi Kleen
2002-04-10 20:15 ` Robert Olsson
2002-04-10 20:56 ` Chris Friesen
2002-04-10 23:02 ` Robert Olsson
2002-04-11 2:24 ` Julian Anastasov
2002-04-11 11:29 ` Robert Olsson
2002-04-11 12:08 ` Julian Anastasov
2002-04-11 12:18 ` jamal
2002-04-11 12:58 ` Julian Anastasov
2002-04-11 13:05 ` jamal
2002-04-11 13:01 ` Robert Olsson [this message]
2002-04-11 13:06 ` Julian Anastasov
2002-04-11 14:53 ` Robert Olsson
2002-04-11 15:24 ` Julian Anastasov
2002-04-11 16:05 ` Robert Olsson
2002-04-10 21:37 ` Julian Anastasov
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-04-10 20:41 Nivedita Singhvi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15541.35087.61146.809057@robur.slu.se \
--to=robert.olsson@data.slu.se \
--cc=cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com \
--cc=ja@ssi.bg \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).