From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_NEOMUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E884DC10F11 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 21:35:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C01632183E for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 21:35:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731967AbfDXVfe (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Apr 2019 17:35:34 -0400 Received: from manchmal.in-ulm.de ([217.10.9.201]:60804 "EHLO manchmal.in-ulm.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731570AbfDXVfe (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Apr 2019 17:35:34 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 403 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 17:35:34 EDT Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 23:28:47 +0200 From: Christoph Biedl To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Karsten Keil , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Tilman Schmidt , Paul Bolle , gigaset307x-common@lists.sourceforge.net, isdn4linux@listserv.isdn4linux.de, Al Viro , Holger Schurig Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] isdn: deprecate non-mISDN drivers Message-ID: <1556140983@msgid.manchmal.in-ulm.de> References: <20190423151143.464992-1-arnd@arndb.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190423151143.464992-1-arnd@arndb.de> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org Arnd Bergmann wrote... > If anyone is still using isdn4linux and CAPI with modern kernels, please > speak up now. Yeah, although I probably don't have much in defense. I am still using it, mostly for isdnlog since I never got mISDN to work. I even wrote the missing sysfs support for i4l some seven years but never had to guts to submit it, mostly since it's not the best code and I never tested the tty part of it. Some many ideas, so many plans, so little time. But I do have to admit the great times of ISDN are in the past and will not come back. Christoph, also happens to be maintainer for the i4l userland in Debian