From: biao huang <biao.huang@mediatek.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, Jose Abreu <joabreu@synopsys.com>
Cc: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@st.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@st.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>, <yt.shen@mediatek.com>,
<jianguo.zhang@mediatek.com>, <boon.leong.ong@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] net: stmmac: modify default value of tx-frames
Date: Fri, 31 May 2019 09:46:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1559267203.24897.101.camel@mhfsdcap03> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190530125832.GB22727@lunn.ch>
Hi Andrew,
On Thu, 2019-05-30 at 14:58 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 04:54:43PM +0800, Biao Huang wrote:
> > the default value of tx-frames is 25, it's too late when
> > passing tstamp to stack, then the ptp4l will fail:
> >
> > ptp4l -i eth0 -f gPTP.cfg -m
> > ptp4l: selected /dev/ptp0 as PTP clock
> > ptp4l: port 1: INITIALIZING to LISTENING on INITIALIZE
> > ptp4l: port 0: INITIALIZING to LISTENING on INITIALIZE
> > ptp4l: port 1: link up
> > ptp4l: timed out while polling for tx timestamp
> > ptp4l: increasing tx_timestamp_timeout may correct this issue,
> > but it is likely caused by a driver bug
> > ptp4l: port 1: send peer delay response failed
> > ptp4l: port 1: LISTENING to FAULTY on FAULT_DETECTED (FT_UNSPECIFIED)
> >
> > ptp4l tests pass when changing the tx-frames from 25 to 1 with
> > ethtool -C option.
> > It should be fine to set tx-frames default value to 1, so ptp4l will pass
> > by default.
>
> Hi Biao
>
> What does this do to the number of interrupts? Do we get 25 times more
> interrupts? Have you done any performance tests to see if this causes
> performance regressions?
Yes, it seems tx-frames=25 can reduce interrupts.
But the tx interrupt is handled in napi now, which will disable/enable
tx interrupts at the beginning/ending of napi flow.
Here is the test result on our platform:
tx-frames=1 tx-frames=25
irq number 478514 393750
performance 904Mbits/sec 902Mbits/sec
commands for test:
"cat /proc/interrupts | grep eth0"
"iperf3 -c ipaddress -w 256K -t 60"
Thanks to napi, the interrupts will not grow 25 times more(almost the
same level), and no obvious performance degradation.
Is there anybody can double check the performance with tx-frames = 0 or
25?
>
> Andrew
Thanks.
Biao
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-31 1:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-30 8:54 [PATCH 0/4] complete dwmac-mediatek driver and fix flow control issue Biao Huang
2019-05-30 8:54 ` [PATCH 1/4] net: stmmac: dwmac-mediatek: enable Ethernet power domain Biao Huang
2019-05-30 8:54 ` [PATCH 2/4] net: stmmac: dwmac-mediatek: disable rx watchdog Biao Huang
2019-05-30 8:54 ` [PATCH 3/4] net: stmmac: modify default value of tx-frames Biao Huang
2019-05-30 12:58 ` Andrew Lunn
2019-05-31 1:46 ` biao huang [this message]
2019-05-30 8:54 ` [PATCH 4/4] net: stmmac: dwmac4: fix flow control issue Biao Huang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1559267203.24897.101.camel@mhfsdcap03 \
--to=biao.huang@mediatek.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@st.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=boon.leong.ong@intel.com \
--cc=jianguo.zhang@mediatek.com \
--cc=joabreu@synopsys.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peppe.cavallaro@st.com \
--cc=yt.shen@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox