From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>, John Gilmore <gnu@toad.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 1/1] Allow 0.0.0.0/8 as a valid address range
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2019 10:07:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1561223254-13589-2-git-send-email-dave.taht@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1561223254-13589-1-git-send-email-dave.taht@gmail.com>
The longstanding prohibition against using 0.0.0.0/8 dates back
to two issues with the early internet.
There was an interoperability problem with BSD 4.2 in 1984, fixed in
BSD 4.3 in 1986. BSD 4.2 has long since been retired.
Secondly, addresses of the form 0.x.y.z were initially defined only as
a source address in an ICMP datagram, indicating "node number x.y.z on
this IPv4 network", by nodes that know their address on their local
network, but do not yet know their network prefix, in RFC0792 (page
19). This usage of 0.x.y.z was later repealed in RFC1122 (section
3.2.2.7), because the original ICMP-based mechanism for learning the
network prefix was unworkable on many networks such as Ethernet (which
have longer addresses that would not fit into the 24 "node number"
bits). Modern networks use reverse ARP (RFC0903) or BOOTP (RFC0951)
or DHCP (RFC2131) to find their full 32-bit address and CIDR netmask
(and other parameters such as default gateways). 0.x.y.z has had
16,777,215 addresses in 0.0.0.0/8 space left unused and reserved for
future use, since 1989.
This patch allows for these 16m new IPv4 addresses to appear within
a box or on the wire. Layer 2 switches don't care.
0.0.0.0/32 is still prohibited, of course.
Signed-off-by: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John Gilmore <gnu@toad.com>
Acked-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
---
include/linux/in.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/in.h b/include/linux/in.h
index 4d2fedfb753a..1873ef642605 100644
--- a/include/linux/in.h
+++ b/include/linux/in.h
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static inline bool ipv4_is_all_snoopers(__be32 addr)
static inline bool ipv4_is_zeronet(__be32 addr)
{
- return (addr & htonl(0xff000000)) == htonl(0x00000000);
+ return (addr == 0);
}
/* Special-Use IPv4 Addresses (RFC3330) */
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-22 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-22 17:07 [net-next 0/1] Allow 0.0.0.0/8 as a valid address range Dave Taht
2019-06-22 17:07 ` Dave Taht [this message]
2019-06-26 20:20 ` [PATCH net-next 1/1] " David Miller
2019-07-14 3:57 ` Paul Marks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1561223254-13589-2-git-send-email-dave.taht@gmail.com \
--to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=gnu@toad.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox