[PATCH net] bnxt_en: Fix VNIC accounting when enabling aRFS on 57500 chips.

[Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>]

Unlike legacy chips, 57500 chips don't need additional VNIC resources
for aRFS/ntuple.  Fix the code accordingly so that we don't reserve
and allocate additional VNICs on 57500 chips.  Without this patch,
the driver is failing to initialize when it tries to allocate extra
VNICs.

Fixes: ac33906c67e2 ("bnxt_en: Add support for aRFS on 57500 chips.")
Signed-off-by: Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>
---

Please queue this for 5.2 -stable also.  Thanks.

 drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c | 7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
index 1069eb0..7134d2c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
@@ -3075,7 +3075,7 @@ static int bnxt_alloc_vnics(struct bnxt *bp)
 	int num_vnics = 1;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL
-	if (bp->flags & BNXT_FLAG_RFS)
+	if ((bp->flags & (BNXT_FLAG_RFS | BNXT_FLAG_CHIP_P5)) == BNXT_FLAG_RFS)
 		num_vnics += bp->rx_nr_rings;
 #endif
 
@@ -7186,6 +7186,9 @@ static int bnxt_alloc_rfs_vnics(struct bnxt *bp)
 #ifdef CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL
 	int i, rc = 0;
 
+	if (bp->flags & BNXT_FLAG_CHIP_P5)
+		return 0;
+
 	for (i = 0; i < bp->rx_nr_rings; i++) {
 		struct bnxt_vnic_info *vnic;
 		u16 vnic_id = i + 1;
@@ -9645,7 +9648,7 @@ int bnxt_check_rings(struct bnxt *bp, int tx, int rx, bool sh, int tcs,
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	vnics = 1;
-	if (bp->flags & BNXT_FLAG_RFS)
+	if ((bp->flags & (BNXT_FLAG_RFS | BNXT_FLAG_CHIP_P5)) == BNXT_FLAG_RFS)
 		vnics += rx_rings;
 
 	if (bp->flags & BNXT_FLAG_AGG_RINGS)
-- 
2.5.1