From: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: "vyasevich@gmail.com" <vyasevich@gmail.com>,
"nhorman@tuxdriver.com" <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
"marcelo.leitner@gmail.com" <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>,
"linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org" <linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/socket: fix GCC8+ Wpacked-not-aligned warnings
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 09:18:24 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1564492704.11067.28.camel@lca.pw> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <91237fd501de4ab895305c4d5666d822@AcuMS.aculab.com>
On Tue, 2019-07-30 at 09:01 +0000, David Laight wrote:
> From: Qian Cai
> > Sent: 29 July 2019 21:24
>
> ..
> > To fix this, "struct sockaddr_storage" needs to be aligned to 4-byte as
> > it is only used in those packed sctp structure which is part of UAPI,
> > and "struct __kernel_sockaddr_storage" is used in some other
> > places of UAPI that need not to change alignments in order to not
> > breaking userspace.
> >
> > One option is use typedef between "sockaddr_storage" and
> > "__kernel_sockaddr_storage" but it needs to change 35 or 370 lines of
> > codes. The other option is to duplicate this simple 2-field structure to
> > have a separate "struct sockaddr_storage" so it can use a different
> > alignment than "__kernel_sockaddr_storage". Also the structure seems
> > stable enough, so it will be low-maintenance to update two structures in
> > the future in case of changes.
>
> Does it all work if the 8 byte alignment is implicit, not explicit?
> For instance if unnamed union and struct are used eg:
>
> struct sockaddr_storage {
> union {
> void * __ptr; /* Force alignment */
> struct {
> __kernel_sa_family_t ss_family; /*
> address family */
> /* Following field(s) are implementation specific */
> char __data[_K_SS_MAXSIZE - sizeof(unsigned
> short)];
> /* space to achieve desired size, */
> /* _SS_MAXSIZE value minus size of
> ss_family */
> };
> };
> };
>
> I suspect unnamed unions and structs have to be allowed by the compiler.
I believe this will suffer the same problem in that will break UAPI,
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190726213045.GL6204@localhost.localdomain/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-30 13:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-29 20:23 [PATCH] net/socket: fix GCC8+ Wpacked-not-aligned warnings Qian Cai
2019-07-30 9:01 ` David Laight
2019-07-30 13:18 ` Qian Cai [this message]
2019-07-30 13:23 ` David Laight
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1564492704.11067.28.camel@lca.pw \
--to=cai@lca.pw \
--cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=vyasevich@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox