From: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
To: Li Xiasong <lixiasong1@huawei.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
yuehaibing@huawei.com, zhangchangzhong@huawei.com,
weiyongjun1@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: core: avoid WARN_ONCE for stale RX queue mappings
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2026 14:58:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <156834bb-8e40-496e-9443-9d515fa18eab@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260810125029.1567742-1-lixiasong1@huawei.com>
On 8/10/26 8:50 PM, Li Xiasong wrote:
> An skb may retain its recorded RX queue index while a network device
> reduces its number of active RX queues. For example, when a TUN queue
> is detached, queued skbs can still carry the queue's previous index.
>
> Both get_rps_cpu() and netif_get_rxqueue() validate the index before
> accessing the RX queue array. They safely fall back to local processing
> or the first RX queue, so an invalid index does not cause an
> out-of-bounds access.
>
> Using WARN_ONCE() for this recoverable condition can unnecessarily
> panic systems with panic_on_warn enabled. Replace it with
> netdev_warn_once() to retain the diagnostic without emitting a WARN
> splat.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Xiasong <lixiasong1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
I just run ethtool -L rx 2 on my host and got such message..
------------[ cut here ]------------
veth1 received packet on queue 2, but number of RX queues is 2
WARNING: net/core/dev.c:5132 at get_rps_cpu+0x1d1/0x4b0, CPU#2:
kworker/2:1/59
<TASK>
netif_rx_internal+0xa1/0x120
__netif_rx+0x19/0xc0
veth_xmit+0x267/0x360
dev_hard_start_xmit+0x64/0x1d0
__dev_queue_xmit+0x803/0x1190
ip6_finish_output2+0x2d2/0x700
ip6_finish_output+0xfb/0x3c0
ip6_output+0x81/0x180
NF_HOOK.constprop.0+0x4f/0x110
mld_sendpack+0x1bf/0x290
mld_ifc_work+0x19a/0x400
process_one_work+0x19c/0x3e0
worker_thread+0x1a8/0x330
kthread+0xfb/0x140
ret_from_fork+0x1c1/0x2c0
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
</TASK>
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
> ---
> net/core/dev.c | 19 ++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index af260ff5462a..5db98b0a853f 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -5126,10 +5126,11 @@ static int get_rps_cpu(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb,
> u16 index = skb_get_rx_queue(skb);
>
> if (unlikely(index >= dev->real_num_rx_queues)) {
> - WARN_ONCE(dev->real_num_rx_queues > 1,
> - "%s received packet on queue %u, but number "
> - "of RX queues is %u\n",
> - dev->name, index, dev->real_num_rx_queues);
> + if (dev->real_num_rx_queues > 1)
> + netdev_warn_once(dev,
> + "received packet on queue %u, but number "
> + "of RX queues is %u\n",
> + index, dev->real_num_rx_queues);
> goto done;
> }
> rxqueue += index;
> @@ -5443,11 +5444,11 @@ static struct netdev_rx_queue *netif_get_rxqueue(struct sk_buff *skb)
> u16 index = skb_get_rx_queue(skb);
>
> if (unlikely(index >= dev->real_num_rx_queues)) {
> - WARN_ONCE(dev->real_num_rx_queues > 1,
> - "%s received packet on queue %u, but number "
> - "of RX queues is %u\n",
> - dev->name, index, dev->real_num_rx_queues);
> -
> + if (dev->real_num_rx_queues > 1)
> + netdev_warn_once(dev,
> + "received packet on queue %u, but number "
> + "of RX queues is %u\n",
> + index, dev->real_num_rx_queues);
> return rxqueue; /* Return first rxqueue */
> }
> rxqueue += index;
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-11 6:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-10 12:50 [PATCH net-next] net: core: avoid WARN_ONCE for stale RX queue mappings Li Xiasong
2026-08-11 6:58 ` Jiayuan Chen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=156834bb-8e40-496e-9443-9d515fa18eab@linux.dev \
--to=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lixiasong1@huawei.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=weiyongjun1@huawei.com \
--cc=yuehaibing@huawei.com \
--cc=zhangchangzhong@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox