From: wenxu@ucloud.cn
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net] net/sched: cls_api: Fix nooffloaddevcnt counter in indr block call success
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 18:15:34 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1568628934-32085-1-git-send-email-wenxu@ucloud.cn> (raw)
From: wenxu <wenxu@ucloud.cn>
When a block bind with a dev which support indr block call(vxlan/gretap
device). It can bind success but with nooffloaddevcnt++. It will fail
when replace the hw filter in tc_setup_cb_call with skip_sw mode for
checkout the nooffloaddevcnt and skip_sw.
if (block->nooffloaddevcnt && err_stop)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
So with this patch, if the indr block call success, it will not modify
the nooffloaddevcnt counter.
Fixes: 7f76fa36754b ("net: sched: register callbacks for indirect tc block binds")
Signed-off-by: wenxu <wenxu@ucloud.cn>
---
net/sched/cls_api.c | 27 +++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sched/cls_api.c b/net/sched/cls_api.c
index efd3cfb..8a1e3a5 100644
--- a/net/sched/cls_api.c
+++ b/net/sched/cls_api.c
@@ -766,10 +766,10 @@ void tc_indr_block_cb_unregister(struct net_device *dev,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tc_indr_block_cb_unregister);
-static void tc_indr_block_call(struct tcf_block *block, struct net_device *dev,
- struct tcf_block_ext_info *ei,
- enum flow_block_command command,
- struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+static int tc_indr_block_call(struct tcf_block *block, struct net_device *dev,
+ struct tcf_block_ext_info *ei,
+ enum flow_block_command command,
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
struct tc_indr_block_cb *indr_block_cb;
struct tc_indr_block_dev *indr_dev;
@@ -785,7 +785,7 @@ static void tc_indr_block_call(struct tcf_block *block, struct net_device *dev,
indr_dev = tc_indr_block_dev_lookup(dev);
if (!indr_dev)
- return;
+ return -ENOENT;
indr_dev->block = command == FLOW_BLOCK_BIND ? block : NULL;
@@ -793,7 +793,10 @@ static void tc_indr_block_call(struct tcf_block *block, struct net_device *dev,
indr_block_cb->cb(dev, indr_block_cb->cb_priv, TC_SETUP_BLOCK,
&bo);
- tcf_block_setup(block, &bo);
+ if (list_empty(&bo.cb_list))
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+ return tcf_block_setup(block, &bo);
}
static bool tcf_block_offload_in_use(struct tcf_block *block)
@@ -849,14 +852,14 @@ static int tcf_block_offload_bind(struct tcf_block *block, struct Qdisc *q,
if (err)
return err;
- tc_indr_block_call(block, dev, ei, FLOW_BLOCK_BIND, extack);
return 0;
no_offload_dev_inc:
if (tcf_block_offload_in_use(block))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
- block->nooffloaddevcnt++;
- tc_indr_block_call(block, dev, ei, FLOW_BLOCK_BIND, extack);
+ err = tc_indr_block_call(block, dev, ei, FLOW_BLOCK_BIND, extack);
+ if (err)
+ block->nooffloaddevcnt++;
return 0;
}
@@ -866,8 +869,6 @@ static void tcf_block_offload_unbind(struct tcf_block *block, struct Qdisc *q,
struct net_device *dev = q->dev_queue->dev;
int err;
- tc_indr_block_call(block, dev, ei, FLOW_BLOCK_UNBIND, NULL);
-
if (!dev->netdev_ops->ndo_setup_tc)
goto no_offload_dev_dec;
err = tcf_block_offload_cmd(block, dev, ei, FLOW_BLOCK_UNBIND, NULL);
@@ -876,7 +877,9 @@ static void tcf_block_offload_unbind(struct tcf_block *block, struct Qdisc *q,
return;
no_offload_dev_dec:
- WARN_ON(block->nooffloaddevcnt-- == 0);
+ err = tc_indr_block_call(block, dev, ei, FLOW_BLOCK_UNBIND, NULL);
+ if (err)
+ WARN_ON(block->nooffloaddevcnt-- == 0);
}
static int
--
1.8.3.1
next reply other threads:[~2019-09-16 10:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-16 10:15 wenxu [this message]
2019-09-16 10:28 ` [PATCH net] net/sched: cls_api: Fix nooffloaddevcnt counter in indr block call success Jiri Pirko
2019-09-16 13:28 ` wenxu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1568628934-32085-1-git-send-email-wenxu@ucloud.cn \
--to=wenxu@ucloud.cn \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox