From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
Cc: mst@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [net-next RFC] pktgen: don't wait for the device who doesn't free skb immediately after sent
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 18:13:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1570859.IePPxHAEX1@jason-thinkpad-t430s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121128085305.2b0503ce@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
On Wednesday, November 28, 2012 08:53:05 AM Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:48:52 +0800
>
> Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On 11/28/2012 12:49 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:45:13 +0800
> > >
> > > Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >> On 11/27/2012 01:37 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > >>> On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:56:52 +0800
> > >>>
> > >>> Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >>>> Some deivces do not free the old tx skbs immediately after it has
> > >>>> been sent
> > >>>> (usually in tx interrupt). One such example is virtio-net which
> > >>>> optimizes for virt and only free the possible old tx skbs during the
> > >>>> next packet sending. This would lead the pktgen to wait forever in
> > >>>> the refcount of the skb if no other pakcet will be sent afterwards.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Solving this issue by introducing a new flag IFF_TX_SKB_FREE_DELAY
> > >>>> which could notify the pktgen that the device does not free skb
> > >>>> immediately after it has been sent and let it not to wait for the
> > >>>> refcount to be one.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> > >>>
> > >>> Another alternative would be using skb_orphan() and skb->destructor.
> > >>> There are other cases where skb's are not freed right away.
> > >>> --
> > >>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> > >>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > >>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > >>
> > >> Hi Stephen:
> > >>
> > >> Do you mean registering a skb->destructor for pktgen then set and check
> > >> bits in skb->tx_flag?
> > >
> > > Yes. Register a destructor that does something like update a counter
> > > (number of packets pending), then just spin while number of packets
> > > pending is over threshold.
> > > --
> >
> > Not sure this is the best method, since pktgen was used to test the tx
> > process of the device driver and NIC. If we use skb_orhpan(), we would
> > miss the test of tx completion part.
>
> There are other places that delay freeing and your solution would mean
> finding and fixing all those. Code that does that already has to use
> skb_orphan() to work, and I was looking for a way that could use that.
> Introducing another flag value seems like a long term burden.
>
Get the point, will draft another version.
> Alternatively, virtio could do cleanup more aggressively. Maybe in response
> to ring getting half full, or add a cleanup timer or something to avoid the
> problem.
May worth to try. Another method is that virtio has a feature to notify guest
when tx ring is empty, we could free the old tx skbs there. But it may brings
extra overhead. If we could let virtio_net free the old tx skb timely, it
would be easier to bring BQL support to virtio_net also.
Thanks
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-29 10:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-26 7:56 [net-next RFC] pktgen: don't wait for the device who doesn't free skb immediately after sent Jason Wang
2012-11-26 17:37 ` Stephen Hemminger
2012-11-27 6:45 ` Jason Wang
2012-11-27 16:49 ` Stephen Hemminger
2012-11-28 6:48 ` Jason Wang
2012-11-28 16:53 ` Stephen Hemminger
2012-11-29 10:13 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2012-11-29 11:30 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-11-29 17:21 ` Stephen Hemminger
2012-12-03 6:45 ` Jason Wang
2012-12-03 16:01 ` Stephen Hemminger
2012-12-04 12:55 ` Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1570859.IePPxHAEX1@jason-thinkpad-t430s \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox