From: Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@canonical.com>
To: zyjzyj2000@gmail.com
Cc: vfalico@gmail.com, gospo@cumulusnetworks.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Boris.Shteinbock@windriver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] bonding: restrict up state in 802.3ad mode
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 13:57:16 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1586.1450389436@famine> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1450339417-31254-1-git-send-email-zyjzyj2000@gmail.com>
<zyjzyj2000@gmail.com> wrote:
>From: Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@gmail.com>
>
>In 802.3ad mode, the speed and duplex is needed. But in some NIC,
>there is a time span between NIC up state and getting speed and duplex.
>As such, sometimes a slave in 802.3ad mode is in up state without
>speed and duplex. This will make bonding in 802.3ad mode can not
>work well.
>To make bonding driver be compatible with more NICs, it is
>necessary to restrict the up state in 802.3ad mode.
What device is this? It seems a bit odd that an Ethernet device
can be carrier up but not have the duplex and speed available.
Also, what are the option settings for bonding? Specifically,
is "use_carrier" set to 0? The default setting is 1.
In general, though, bonding expects a speed or duplex change to
be announced via a NETDEV_UPDATE or NETDEV_UP notifier, which would
propagate to the 802.3ad logic.
If the device here is going carrier up prior to having speed or
duplex available, then maybe it should call netdev_state_change() when
the duplex and speed are available, or delay calling netif_carrier_on().
>Signed-off-by: Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@gmail.com>
>---
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>index 9e0f8a7..0a80fb3 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>@@ -1991,6 +1991,25 @@ static int bond_miimon_inspect(struct bonding *bond)
>
> link_state = bond_check_dev_link(bond, slave->dev, 0);
>
>+ /* Since some NIC has time span between netif_running and
>+ * getting speed and duples. That is, after a NIC is up (netif_running),
>+ * there is a time span before this NIC is negotiated with speed and duplex.
>+ * During this time span, the slave in 802.3ad is configured without speed
>+ * and duplex. This 802.3ad bonding will not work because it needs slave's speed
>+ * and duplex to generate key field.
>+ * As such, we restrict up in 802.3ad mode to: netif_running && peed != SPEED_UNKNOWN &&
>+ * duplex != DUPLEX_UNKNOWN
>+ */
>+ if ((BMSR_LSTATUS == link_state) &&
>+ (BOND_MODE(bond) == BOND_MODE_8023AD)) {
>+ bond_update_speed_duplex(slave);
>+ if ((slave->speed == SPEED_UNKNOWN) ||
>+ (slave->duplex == DUPLEX_UNKNOWN)) {
>+ link_state = 0;
>+ netdev_info(bond->dev, "In 802.3ad mode, it is not enough to up without speed and duplex");
>+ }
>+ }
Also, as a functional note on this patch, the above looks like
it will spam the log repeatedly every miimon interval for as long as the
"carrier up but no speed/duplex" situation persists.
-J
> switch (slave->link) {
> case BOND_LINK_UP:
> if (link_state)
>--
>1.7.9.5
>
---
-Jay Vosburgh, jay.vosburgh@canonical.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-17 21:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-17 8:03 [PATCH 1/1] bonding: restrict up state in 802.3ad mode zyjzyj2000
2015-12-17 21:57 ` Jay Vosburgh [this message]
2015-12-18 4:36 ` zyjzyj2000
2015-12-18 4:36 ` [PATCH 1/1] bonding: delay up state without speed and duplex " zyjzyj2000
2015-12-18 4:54 ` Jay Vosburgh
2015-12-18 13:37 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-12-28 8:43 ` [PATCH 1/1] bonding: restrict up state " Michal Kubecek
2015-12-28 9:19 ` zhuyj
2016-01-06 1:26 ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-06 3:05 ` zhuyj
2016-01-07 2:43 ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-07 3:33 ` zhuyj
2016-01-07 5:02 ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-07 6:15 ` zyjzyj2000
2016-01-07 6:22 ` zhuyj
2016-01-07 6:33 ` Jay Vosburgh
2016-01-07 15:27 ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-08 1:28 ` [RFC PATCH net-next] bonding: Use notifiers for slave link state detection Jay Vosburgh
2016-01-08 4:36 ` zhuyj
2016-01-08 6:12 ` Jay Vosburgh
2016-01-08 7:41 ` (unknown), zyjzyj2000
2016-01-08 7:41 ` [PATCH 1/1] bonding: utilize notifier callbacks to detect slave link state changes zyjzyj2000
2016-01-08 10:18 ` zhuyj
2016-01-09 1:35 ` [RFC PATCH net-next] bonding: Use notifiers for slave link state detection Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-09 2:19 ` Jay Vosburgh
2016-01-11 9:03 ` zhuyj
2016-01-13 2:54 ` zhuyj
2016-01-13 17:03 ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-20 5:13 ` [PATCH 1/1] " zyjzyj2000
2016-01-20 5:13 ` zyjzyj2000
2016-01-21 10:16 ` zyjzyj2000
2016-01-21 10:16 ` zyjzyj2000
2016-01-25 16:37 ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-26 0:43 ` Jay Vosburgh
2016-01-26 3:19 ` zhuyj
2016-01-26 6:00 ` Jay Vosburgh
2016-01-26 6:26 ` zhuyj
2016-01-26 6:45 ` zhuyj
2016-01-27 20:00 ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-28 8:44 ` zyjzyj2000
2016-01-29 7:05 ` zhuyj
2016-01-25 16:33 ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-25 18:00 ` David Miller
2016-01-25 18:37 ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-08 2:29 ` [PATCH 1/1] bonding: restrict up state in 802.3ad mode zhuyj
2016-01-07 6:53 ` Michal Kubecek
2016-01-07 7:37 ` zhuyj
2016-01-07 7:59 ` Michal Kubecek
2016-01-07 8:35 ` zhuyj
2016-01-07 7:47 ` zhuyj
2016-01-07 18:28 ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-08 6:09 ` zhuyj
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-01-07 6:13 zyjzyj2000
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1586.1450389436@famine \
--to=jay.vosburgh@canonical.com \
--cc=Boris.Shteinbock@windriver.com \
--cc=gospo@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vfalico@gmail.com \
--cc=zyjzyj2000@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).