public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fernando Fernandez Mancera <fmancera@suse.de>
To: luka.gejak@linux.dev, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
	kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, fmaurer@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 1/2] net: hsr: require valid EOT supervision TLV
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2026 10:05:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <15888967-8372-4c6b-b3ec-3cb336dcebbb@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e29b7837-70ab-4db2-b9e5-abb59d8721d7@suse.de>

On 4/8/26 9:48 AM, Fernando Fernandez Mancera wrote:
> On 4/7/26 6:25 PM, luka.gejak@linux.dev wrote:
>> From: Luka Gejak <luka.gejak@linux.dev>
>>
>> Supervision frames are only valid if terminated with a zero-length EOT
>> TLV. The current check fails to reject non-EOT entries as the terminal
>> TLV, potentially allowing malformed supervision traffic.
>>
>> Fix this by strictly requiring the terminal TLV to be HSR_TLV_EOT
>> with a length of zero, and properly linearizing the TLV header before
>> access.
>>
>> Assisted-by: Gemini:Gemini-3.1-flash
>> Signed-off-by: Luka Gejak <luka.gejak@linux.dev>
>> ---
>>   net/hsr/hsr_forward.c | 20 +++++++++-----------
>>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/hsr/hsr_forward.c b/net/hsr/hsr_forward.c
>> index 0aca859c88cb..eb89cc44eac0 100644
>> --- a/net/hsr/hsr_forward.c
>> +++ b/net/hsr/hsr_forward.c
>> @@ -82,35 +82,33 @@ static bool is_supervision_frame(struct hsr_priv 
>> *hsr, struct sk_buff *skb)
>>           hsr_sup_tag->tlv.HSR_TLV_length != sizeof(struct 
>> hsr_sup_payload))
>>           return false;
>> -    /* Get next tlv */
>> +    /* Get next TLV */
>>       total_length += hsr_sup_tag->tlv.HSR_TLV_length;
>> -    if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, total_length))
>> +    if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, total_length + sizeof(struct hsr_sup_tlv)))
>>           return false;
>>       skb_pull(skb, total_length);
>>       hsr_sup_tlv = (struct hsr_sup_tlv *)skb->data;
>>       skb_push(skb, total_length);
>> -    /* if this is a redbox supervision frame we need to verify
>> -     * that more data is available
>> -     */
>> +    /* If this is a RedBox supervision frame, verify additional data */
>>       if (hsr_sup_tlv->HSR_TLV_type == PRP_TLV_REDBOX_MAC) {
>> -        /* tlv length must be a length of a mac address */
>> +        /* TLV length must be the size of a MAC address */
>>           if (hsr_sup_tlv->HSR_TLV_length != sizeof(struct 
>> hsr_sup_payload))
>>               return false;
>> -        /* make sure another tlv follows */
>> +        /* Make sure another TLV follows */
>>           total_length += sizeof(struct hsr_sup_tlv) + hsr_sup_tlv- 
>> >HSR_TLV_length;
>> -        if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, total_length))
>> +        if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, total_length + sizeof(struct 
>> hsr_sup_tlv)))
> 
> Hi Luka,
> 
> why is the length adjusted here? The current total length was adjusted 
> correctly above see:
> 

Never mind, it makes sense as the total_length must point to the 
beginning of the next TLV.

LGTM,

Reviewed-by: Fernando Fernandez Mancera <fmancera@suse.de>

Thanks,
Fernando.

>>               return false;
>> -        /* get next tlv */
>> +        /* Get next TLV */
>>           skb_pull(skb, total_length);
>>           hsr_sup_tlv = (struct hsr_sup_tlv *)skb->data;
>>           skb_push(skb, total_length);
>>       }
>> -    /* end of tlvs must follow at the end */
>> -    if (hsr_sup_tlv->HSR_TLV_type == HSR_TLV_EOT &&
>> +    /* Supervision frame must end with EOT TLV */
>> +    if (hsr_sup_tlv->HSR_TLV_type != HSR_TLV_EOT ||
>>           hsr_sup_tlv->HSR_TLV_length != 0)
>>           return false;
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-08  8:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-07 16:25 [PATCH net-next v5 0/2] net: hsr: strict supervision TLV validation luka.gejak
2026-04-07 16:25 ` [PATCH net-next v5 1/2] net: hsr: require valid EOT supervision TLV luka.gejak
2026-04-08  7:48   ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-04-08  8:05     ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera [this message]
2026-04-08  8:19       ` Luka Gejak
2026-04-08  9:32   ` Felix Maurer
2026-04-07 16:25 ` [PATCH net-next v5 2/2] net: hsr: reject unresolved interlink ifindex luka.gejak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=15888967-8372-4c6b-b3ec-3cb336dcebbb@suse.de \
    --to=fmancera@suse.de \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fmaurer@redhat.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=luka.gejak@linux.dev \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox