unstable xdp tests. Was: [PATCH net-next v4 31/33] bpf: add xdp.frame_sz in bpf_prog_test_run_xdp().

Alexei Starovoitov
2020-05-17T04:02:16Z

On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 3:51 AM Jesper Dangaard Brouer
<brouer@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Update the memory requirements, when adding xdp.frame_sz in BPF test_run
> function bpf_prog_test_run_xdp() which e.g. is used by XDP selftests.
>
> Specifically add the expected reserved tailroom, but also allocated a
> larger memory area to reflect that XDP frames usually comes in this
> format. Limit the provided packet data size to 4096 minus headroom +
> tailroom, as this also reflect a common 3520 bytes MTU limit with XDP.
>
> Note that bpf_test_init already use a memory allocation method that clears
> memory. Thus, this already guards against leaking uninit kernel memory.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
> ---
> net/bpf/test_run.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
> index 29dbdd4c29f6..30ba7d38941d 100644
> --- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
> +++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
> @@ -470,25 +470,34 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_skb(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr,
> int bpf_prog_test_run_xdp(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr,
> union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
> {
> + u32 tailroom = SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info));
> + u32 headroom = XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM;
> u32 size = kattr->test.data_size_in;
> u32 repeat = kattr->test.repeat;
> struct netdev_rx_queue *rxqueue;
> struct xdp_buff xdp = {};
> u32 retval, duration;
> + u32 max_data_sz;
> void *data;
> int ret;
>
> if (kattr->test.ctx_in || kattr->test.ctx_out)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - data = bpf_test_init(kattr, size, XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM + NET_IP_ALIGN, 0);
> + /* XDP have extra tailroom as (most) drivers use full page */
> + max_data_sz = 4096 - headroom - tailroom;
> + if (size > max_data_sz)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + data = bpf_test_init(kattr, max_data_sz, headroom, tailroom);

Hi Jesper,

above is buggy.
max_data_sz is way more than what user space has.
That causes xdp unit tests to fail sporadically with EFAULT.
Like:
./test_progs -t xdp_perf
test_xdp_perf:FAIL:xdp-perf err -1 errno 14 retval 0 size 0
#89 xdp_perf:FAIL

For that test max_data_sz will be 3520 while user space prepared only 128 bytes
and copy_from_user will fault.