From: Martin Schiller <ms@dev.tdt.de>
To: Xie He <xie.he.0141@gmail.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
linux-x25@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: lapbether: Consider it successful if (dis)connecting when already (dis)connected
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 07:41:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15c1ad7b52562e2ca37d8084a90197d8@dev.tdt.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201208225044.5522-1-xie.he.0141@gmail.com>
On 2020-12-08 23:50, Xie He wrote:
> When the upper layer instruct us to connect (or disconnect), but we
> have
> already connected (or disconnected), consider this operation successful
> rather than failed.
>
> This can help the upper layer to correct its record about whether we
> are
> connected or not here in layer 2.
>
> The upper layer may not have the correct information about whether we
> are
> connected or not. This can happen if this driver has already been
> running
> for some time when the "x25" module gets loaded.
>
> Another X.25 driver (hdlc_x25) is already doing this, so we make this
> driver do this, too.
Looks good to me.
Acked-by: Martin Schiller <ms@dev.tdt.de>
>
> Cc: Martin Schiller <ms@dev.tdt.de>
> Signed-off-by: Xie He <xie.he.0141@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/wan/lapbether.c | 13 +++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wan/lapbether.c b/drivers/net/wan/lapbether.c
> index b6be2454b8bd..605fe555e157 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wan/lapbether.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wan/lapbether.c
> @@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ struct lapbethdev {
>
> static LIST_HEAD(lapbeth_devices);
>
> +static void lapbeth_connected(struct net_device *dev, int reason);
> +static void lapbeth_disconnected(struct net_device *dev, int reason);
> +
> /*
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> */
>
> /*
> @@ -167,11 +170,17 @@ static netdev_tx_t lapbeth_xmit(struct sk_buff
> *skb,
> case X25_IFACE_DATA:
> break;
> case X25_IFACE_CONNECT:
> - if ((err = lapb_connect_request(dev)) != LAPB_OK)
> + err = lapb_connect_request(dev);
> + if (err == LAPB_CONNECTED)
> + lapbeth_connected(dev, LAPB_OK);
> + else if (err != LAPB_OK)
> pr_err("lapb_connect_request error: %d\n", err);
> goto drop;
> case X25_IFACE_DISCONNECT:
> - if ((err = lapb_disconnect_request(dev)) != LAPB_OK)
> + err = lapb_disconnect_request(dev);
> + if (err == LAPB_NOTCONNECTED)
> + lapbeth_disconnected(dev, LAPB_OK);
> + else if (err != LAPB_OK)
> pr_err("lapb_disconnect_request err: %d\n", err);
> fallthrough;
> default:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-10 6:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-08 22:50 [PATCH net-next] net: lapbether: Consider it successful if (dis)connecting when already (dis)connected Xie He
2020-12-10 6:41 ` Martin Schiller [this message]
2020-12-10 21:19 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15c1ad7b52562e2ca37d8084a90197d8@dev.tdt.de \
--to=ms@dev.tdt.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-x25@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xie.he.0141@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).