From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Or Gerlitz Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] tun: export underlying socket Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:07:25 +0300 Message-ID: <15ddcffd0909140107m4d94f5abh5405074b654bd15d@mail.gmail.com> References: <20090910125929.GA32593@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: David Miller , m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, Or Gerlitz To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Return-path: Received: from mail-fx0-f217.google.com ([209.85.220.217]:50836 "EHLO mail-fx0-f217.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752996AbZINIHW (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Sep 2009 04:07:22 -0400 Received: by fxm17 with SMTP id 17so655596fxm.37 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 01:07:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20090910125929.GA32593@redhat.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 9/10/09, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > This way, code using raw sockets to inject packets into a physical device, > can support injecting packets into host network stack almost without modification. > First user of this interface will be vhost virtualization accelerator. vhost injects packet into physical device, what is the use case of vhost injecting packet into the host network stack? Or.