From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Or Gerlitz Subject: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH 18/23 v3] mlx4_core: Managing common port Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:19:03 +0200 Message-ID: <15ddcffd1002170419h2b32c044r1bdb40ed4f5753c2@mail.gmail.com> References: <4B7ABBE6.1010506@mellanox.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Roland Dreier , netdev@vger.kernel.org, tziporet@mellanox.co.il, liranl@mellanox.co.il To: Yevgeny Petrilin Return-path: Received: from mail-bw0-f219.google.com ([209.85.218.219]:43877 "EHLO mail-bw0-f219.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757160Ab0BQMTF (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Feb 2010 07:19:05 -0500 Received: by bwz19 with SMTP id 19so5409499bwz.28 for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 04:19:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B7ABBE6.1010506@mellanox.co.il> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Yevgeny Petrilin wrote: > HW filtering, the SW configures the filter. I understand that at some point you plan to move to HW filter, so maybe to rephrase the question: is this patch set applicable without the HW filter in place? if yes, I understood you were planning on software filtering and wondered in what level its expected to happen. Or.