From: Dan Geist <dan@polter.net>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
chenweilong@huawei.com, Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: [Bug 194749] New: kernel bonding does not work in a network nameservice in versions above 3.10.0-229.20.1
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 15:39:59 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1601587594.2278.1488487199506.JavaMail.zimbra@polter.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAM_iQpVm_WK9X+3Vsm0OrFCOd3Srn-s+xqe9fQtoT=30JZeVJQ@mail.gmail.com>
----- On Mar 2, 2017, at 3:11 PM, Cong Wang xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com wrote
> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Stephen Hemminger
> <stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>> Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 21:08:01 +0000
>> From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
>> To: stephen@networkplumber.org
>> Subject: [Bug 194749] New: kernel bonding does not work in a network nameservice
>> in versions above 3.10.0-229.20.1
>>
>>
>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194749
>>
>> Bug ID: 194749
>> Summary: kernel bonding does not work in a network nameservice
>> in versions above 3.10.0-229.20.1
>> Product: Networking
>> Version: 2.5
>> Kernel Version: > 3.10.0-229.20.1
>> Hardware: x86-64
>> OS: Linux
>> Tree: Mainline
>> Status: NEW
>> Severity: blocking
>> Priority: P1
>> Component: Other
>> Assignee: stephen@networkplumber.org
>> Reporter: dan@polter.net
>> Regression: No
>>
>> bond interface is being used in active/standby mode with two physical NICs
>> inside a network nameservice to provide switchpath redundancy.
>>
>> netns is instantiated post-boot with the following:
>>
>> ip netns add vntp
>> ip link set p4p1 netns vntp
>> ip link set p4p2 netns vntp
>> ip link set bond0 netns vntp
>> ip netns exec vntp ip link set lo up
>> ip netns exec vntp ip link set p4p1 up
>> ip netns exec vntp ip link set p4p2 up
>> ip netns exec vntp ip link set bond0 up
>> ip netns exec vntp ifenslave bond0 p4p1 p4p2
>
> This is due to the following commit:
>
> commit f9399814927ad9bb995a6e109c2a5f9d8a848209
> Author: Weilong Chen <chenweilong@huawei.com>
> Date: Wed Jan 22 17:16:30 2014 +0800
>
> bonding: Don't allow bond devices to change network namespaces.
>
> Like bridge, bonding as netdevice doesn't cross netns boundaries.
>
> Bonding ports and bonding itself live in same netns.
>
> Signed-off-by: Weilong Chen <chenweilong@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
>
>
> NETIF_F_NETNS_LOCAL was introduced for loopback device which
> is created for each netns, it is not clear why we need to add it to bond
> and bridge...
Thank you for tracking this down. Without digging through the code to figure it out, does this imply that the existence of a bond interface is not possible AT ALL within a netns or simply that it may not be "migrated" between the global scope and a netns?
In order for the CentOS network stack to init the interfaces, I've been creating them with the standard system configuration files:
[root@01 network-scripts]# cat ifcfg-p4p1
TYPE=Ethernet
BOOTPROTO=none
DEVICE=p4p1
ONBOOT=yes
MASTER=bond0
SLAVE=yes
UUID=4e6c40ee-cc05-4f88-a851-b3185dbdcd0f
NAME=p4p1
[root@01 network-scripts]# cat ifcfg-p4p2
TYPE=Ethernet
BOOTPROTO=none
DEVICE=p4p2
ONBOOT=yes
MASTER=bond0
SLAVE=yes
UUID=15135328-12b8-4fe3-8940-db02b77b94d9
NAME=p4p2
[root@01 network-scripts]# cat ifcfg-bond0
DEVICE=bond0
TYPE=Bond
BONDING_MASTER=yes
NAME=bond0
UUID=97674993-0e50-4a00-a210-c66d75481a84
ONBOOT=yes
BONDING_OPTS="updelay=0 resend_igmp=1 use_carrier=1 miimon=100 downdelay=0 xmit_hash_policy=0 primary_reselect=0 fail_over_mac=0 arp_validate=0 mode=active-backup lacp_rate=0 arp_interval=0 ad_select=0"
IPV6INIT=no
Perhaps by not instantiating the bond interface until after the netns is created, this situation can be avoided?
Thanks.
Dan
--
Dan Geist dan(@)polter.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-02 22:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-02 18:32 Fw: [Bug 194749] New: kernel bonding does not work in a network nameservice in versions above 3.10.0-229.20.1 Stephen Hemminger
2017-03-02 20:11 ` Cong Wang
2017-03-02 20:39 ` Dan Geist [this message]
2017-03-03 15:19 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2017-03-03 16:03 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-03-03 16:22 ` Dan Geist
2017-03-03 16:25 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2017-03-03 18:11 ` Cong Wang
2017-03-04 9:43 ` Jiri Pirko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1601587594.2278.1488487199506.JavaMail.zimbra@polter.net \
--to=dan@polter.net \
--cc=chenweilong@huawei.com \
--cc=jiri@mellanox.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).