public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, dev@openvswitch.org, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, pshelar@ovn.org, jlelli@redhat.com,
	bigeasy@linutronix.de
Subject: [PATCH net v2] net: openvswitch: fix to make sure flow_lookup() is not preempted
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 11:46:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <160275519174.566500.6537031776378218151.stgit@ebuild> (raw)

The flow_lookup() function uses per CPU variables, which must not be
preempted. However, this is fine in the general napi use case where
the local BH is disabled. But, it's also called in the netlink
context, which is preemptible. The below patch makes sure that even
in the netlink path, preemption is disabled.

In addition, the u64_stats_update_begin() sync point was not protected,
making the sync point part of the per CPU variable fixed this.

Fixes: eac87c413bf9 ("net: openvswitch: reorder masks array based on usage")
Reported-by: Juri Lelli <jlelli@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com>
---
v2: - Add u64_stats_update_begin() sync point protection
    - Moved patch to net from net-next branch

 net/openvswitch/flow_table.c |   56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 net/openvswitch/flow_table.h |    8 +++++-
 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c b/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c
index e2235849a57e..d90b4af6f539 100644
--- a/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c
+++ b/net/openvswitch/flow_table.c
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ static struct table_instance *table_instance_alloc(int new_size)
 
 static void __mask_array_destroy(struct mask_array *ma)
 {
-	free_percpu(ma->masks_usage_cntr);
+	free_percpu(ma->masks_usage_stats);
 	kfree(ma);
 }
 
@@ -196,15 +196,15 @@ static void tbl_mask_array_reset_counters(struct mask_array *ma)
 		ma->masks_usage_zero_cntr[i] = 0;
 
 		for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
-			u64 *usage_counters = per_cpu_ptr(ma->masks_usage_cntr,
-							  cpu);
+			struct mask_array_stats *stats;
 			unsigned int start;
 			u64 counter;
 
+			stats = per_cpu_ptr(ma->masks_usage_stats, cpu);
 			do {
-				start = u64_stats_fetch_begin_irq(&ma->syncp);
-				counter = usage_counters[i];
-			} while (u64_stats_fetch_retry_irq(&ma->syncp, start));
+				start = u64_stats_fetch_begin_irq(&stats->syncp);
+				counter = stats->usage_cntrs[i];
+			} while (u64_stats_fetch_retry_irq(&stats->syncp, start));
 
 			ma->masks_usage_zero_cntr[i] += counter;
 		}
@@ -227,9 +227,10 @@ static struct mask_array *tbl_mask_array_alloc(int size)
 					     sizeof(struct sw_flow_mask *) *
 					     size);
 
-	new->masks_usage_cntr = __alloc_percpu(sizeof(u64) * size,
-					       __alignof__(u64));
-	if (!new->masks_usage_cntr) {
+	new->masks_usage_stats = __alloc_percpu(sizeof(struct mask_array_stats) +
+						sizeof(u64) * size,
+						__alignof__(u64));
+	if (!new->masks_usage_stats) {
 		kfree(new);
 		return NULL;
 	}
@@ -732,7 +733,7 @@ static struct sw_flow *flow_lookup(struct flow_table *tbl,
 				   u32 *n_cache_hit,
 				   u32 *index)
 {
-	u64 *usage_counters = this_cpu_ptr(ma->masks_usage_cntr);
+	struct mask_array_stats *stats = this_cpu_ptr(ma->masks_usage_stats);
 	struct sw_flow *flow;
 	struct sw_flow_mask *mask;
 	int i;
@@ -742,9 +743,9 @@ static struct sw_flow *flow_lookup(struct flow_table *tbl,
 		if (mask) {
 			flow = masked_flow_lookup(ti, key, mask, n_mask_hit);
 			if (flow) {
-				u64_stats_update_begin(&ma->syncp);
-				usage_counters[*index]++;
-				u64_stats_update_end(&ma->syncp);
+				u64_stats_update_begin(&stats->syncp);
+				stats->usage_cntrs[*index]++;
+				u64_stats_update_end(&stats->syncp);
 				(*n_cache_hit)++;
 				return flow;
 			}
@@ -763,9 +764,9 @@ static struct sw_flow *flow_lookup(struct flow_table *tbl,
 		flow = masked_flow_lookup(ti, key, mask, n_mask_hit);
 		if (flow) { /* Found */
 			*index = i;
-			u64_stats_update_begin(&ma->syncp);
-			usage_counters[*index]++;
-			u64_stats_update_end(&ma->syncp);
+			u64_stats_update_begin(&stats->syncp);
+			stats->usage_cntrs[*index]++;
+			u64_stats_update_end(&stats->syncp);
 			return flow;
 		}
 	}
@@ -851,9 +852,17 @@ struct sw_flow *ovs_flow_tbl_lookup(struct flow_table *tbl,
 	struct mask_array *ma = rcu_dereference_ovsl(tbl->mask_array);
 	u32 __always_unused n_mask_hit;
 	u32 __always_unused n_cache_hit;
+	struct sw_flow *flow;
 	u32 index = 0;
 
-	return flow_lookup(tbl, ti, ma, key, &n_mask_hit, &n_cache_hit, &index);
+	/* This function gets called trough the netlink interface and therefore
+	 * is preemptible. However, flow_lookup() function needs to be called
+	 * with preemption disabled due to CPU specific variables.
+	 */
+	local_bh_disable();
+	flow = flow_lookup(tbl, ti, ma, key, &n_mask_hit, &n_cache_hit, &index);
+	local_bh_enable();
+	return flow;
 }
 
 struct sw_flow *ovs_flow_tbl_lookup_exact(struct flow_table *tbl,
@@ -1109,7 +1118,6 @@ void ovs_flow_masks_rebalance(struct flow_table *table)
 
 	for (i = 0; i < ma->max; i++)  {
 		struct sw_flow_mask *mask;
-		unsigned int start;
 		int cpu;
 
 		mask = rcu_dereference_ovsl(ma->masks[i]);
@@ -1120,14 +1128,16 @@ void ovs_flow_masks_rebalance(struct flow_table *table)
 		masks_and_count[i].counter = 0;
 
 		for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
-			u64 *usage_counters = per_cpu_ptr(ma->masks_usage_cntr,
-							  cpu);
+			struct mask_array_stats *stats;
+			unsigned int start;
 			u64 counter;
 
+			stats = per_cpu_ptr(ma->masks_usage_stats, cpu);
 			do {
-				start = u64_stats_fetch_begin_irq(&ma->syncp);
-				counter = usage_counters[i];
-			} while (u64_stats_fetch_retry_irq(&ma->syncp, start));
+				start = u64_stats_fetch_begin_irq(&stats->syncp);
+				counter = stats->usage_cntrs[i];
+			} while (u64_stats_fetch_retry_irq(&stats->syncp,
+							   start));
 
 			masks_and_count[i].counter += counter;
 		}
diff --git a/net/openvswitch/flow_table.h b/net/openvswitch/flow_table.h
index 6e7d4ac59353..43144396e192 100644
--- a/net/openvswitch/flow_table.h
+++ b/net/openvswitch/flow_table.h
@@ -38,12 +38,16 @@ struct mask_count {
 	u64 counter;
 };
 
+struct mask_array_stats {
+	struct u64_stats_sync syncp;
+	u64 usage_cntrs[];
+};
+
 struct mask_array {
 	struct rcu_head rcu;
 	int count, max;
-	u64 __percpu *masks_usage_cntr;
+	struct mask_array_stats __percpu *masks_usage_stats;
 	u64 *masks_usage_zero_cntr;
-	struct u64_stats_sync syncp;
 	struct sw_flow_mask __rcu *masks[];
 };
 


             reply	other threads:[~2020-10-15  9:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-15  9:46 Eelco Chaudron [this message]
2020-10-15 10:27 ` [ovs-dev] [PATCH net v2] net: openvswitch: fix to make sure flow_lookup() is not preempted Ilya Maximets
2020-10-15 10:54   ` Eelco Chaudron
2020-10-15 11:04     ` Ilya Maximets
2020-10-15 11:22       ` Ilya Maximets
2020-10-15 12:42         ` Eelco Chaudron
2020-10-15 12:34 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-10-15 17:06   ` Eelco Chaudron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=160275519174.566500.6537031776378218151.stgit@ebuild \
    --to=echaudro@redhat.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dev@openvswitch.org \
    --cc=jlelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=pshelar@ovn.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox