From: Thomas Falcon <tlfalcon@linux.ibm.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, dnbanerg@us.ibm.com,
brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com, pradeep@us.ibm.com,
drt@linux.vnet.ibm.com, sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
ljp@linux.vnet.ibm.com, cforno12@linux.ibm.com,
tlfalcon@linux.ibm.com, ricklind@linux.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH net-next 10/12] ibmvnic: Correctly re-enable interrupts in NAPI polling routine
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 13:10:05 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1605208207-1896-11-git-send-email-tlfalcon@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1605208207-1896-1-git-send-email-tlfalcon@linux.ibm.com>
From: "Dwip N. Banerjee" <dnbanerg@us.ibm.com>
If the current NAPI polling loop exits without completing it's
budget, only re-enable interrupts if there are no entries remaining
in the queue and napi_complete_done is successful. If there are entries
remaining on the queue that were missed, restart the polling loop.
Signed-off-by: Dwip N. Banerjee <dnbanerg@us.ibm.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
index dc42bdc6d3e1..e48a44d8884c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
@@ -2387,10 +2387,17 @@ static void remove_buff_from_pool(struct ibmvnic_adapter *adapter,
static int ibmvnic_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
{
- struct net_device *netdev = napi->dev;
- struct ibmvnic_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
- int scrq_num = (int)(napi - adapter->napi);
- int frames_processed = 0;
+ struct ibmvnic_sub_crq_queue *rx_scrq;
+ struct ibmvnic_adapter *adapter;
+ struct net_device *netdev;
+ int frames_processed;
+ int scrq_num;
+
+ netdev = napi->dev;
+ adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
+ scrq_num = (int)(napi - adapter->napi);
+ frames_processed = 0;
+ rx_scrq = adapter->rx_scrq[scrq_num];
restart_poll:
while (frames_processed < budget) {
@@ -2403,16 +2410,16 @@ static int ibmvnic_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
if (unlikely(test_bit(0, &adapter->resetting) &&
adapter->reset_reason != VNIC_RESET_NON_FATAL)) {
- enable_scrq_irq(adapter, adapter->rx_scrq[scrq_num]);
+ enable_scrq_irq(adapter, rx_scrq);
napi_complete_done(napi, frames_processed);
return frames_processed;
}
- if (!pending_scrq(adapter, adapter->rx_scrq[scrq_num]))
+ if (!pending_scrq(adapter, rx_scrq))
break;
/* ensure that we do not prematurely exit the polling loop */
dma_rmb();
- next = ibmvnic_next_scrq(adapter, adapter->rx_scrq[scrq_num]);
+ next = ibmvnic_next_scrq(adapter, rx_scrq);
rx_buff =
(struct ibmvnic_rx_buff *)be64_to_cpu(next->
rx_comp.correlator);
@@ -2471,14 +2478,16 @@ static int ibmvnic_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
if (adapter->state != VNIC_CLOSING)
replenish_rx_pool(adapter, &adapter->rx_pool[scrq_num]);
-
if (frames_processed < budget) {
- enable_scrq_irq(adapter, adapter->rx_scrq[scrq_num]);
- napi_complete_done(napi, frames_processed);
- if (pending_scrq(adapter, adapter->rx_scrq[scrq_num]) &&
- napi_reschedule(napi)) {
- disable_scrq_irq(adapter, adapter->rx_scrq[scrq_num]);
- goto restart_poll;
+ if (napi_complete_done(napi, frames_processed)) {
+ enable_scrq_irq(adapter, rx_scrq);
+ if (pending_scrq(adapter, rx_scrq)) {
+ rmb();
+ if (napi_reschedule(napi)) {
+ disable_scrq_irq(adapter, rx_scrq);
+ goto restart_poll;
+ }
+ }
}
}
return frames_processed;
--
2.26.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-12 19:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-12 19:09 [PATCH net-next 00/12] ibmvnic: Performance improvements and other updates Thomas Falcon
2020-11-12 19:09 ` [PATCH net-next 01/12] ibmvnic: Ensure that subCRQ entry reads are ordered Thomas Falcon
2020-11-13 5:45 ` drt
2020-11-13 16:14 ` Brian King
2020-11-14 23:35 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-16 18:28 ` Thomas Falcon
2020-11-16 18:30 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-12 19:09 ` [PATCH net-next 02/12] ibmvnic: Introduce indirect subordinate Command Response Queue buffer Thomas Falcon
2020-11-13 16:17 ` Brian King
2020-11-14 23:35 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-16 18:18 ` Thomas Falcon
2020-11-12 19:09 ` [PATCH net-next 03/12] ibmvnic: Introduce batched RX buffer descriptor transmission Thomas Falcon
2020-11-12 19:09 ` [PATCH net-next 04/12] ibmvnic: Introduce xmit_more support using batched subCRQ hcalls Thomas Falcon
2020-11-14 23:46 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-16 18:40 ` Thomas Falcon
2020-11-12 19:10 ` [PATCH net-next 05/12] ibmvnic: Fix TX completion error handling Thomas Falcon
2020-11-12 19:10 ` [PATCH net-next 06/12] ibmvnic: Clean up TX code and TX buffer data structure Thomas Falcon
2020-11-12 19:10 ` [PATCH net-next 07/12] ibmvnic: Clean up TX error handling and statistics tracking Thomas Falcon
2020-11-12 19:10 ` [PATCH net-next 08/12] ibmvnic: Remove send_subcrq function Thomas Falcon
2020-11-12 19:10 ` [PATCH net-next 09/12] ibmvnic: Ensure that device queue memory is cache-line aligned Thomas Falcon
2020-11-12 19:10 ` Thomas Falcon [this message]
2020-11-12 19:10 ` [PATCH net-next 11/12] ibmvnic: Use netdev_alloc_skb instead of alloc_skb to replenish RX buffers Thomas Falcon
2020-11-12 19:10 ` [PATCH net-next 12/12] ibmvnic: Do not replenish RX buffers after every polling loop Thomas Falcon
2020-11-13 5:52 ` drt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1605208207-1896-11-git-send-email-tlfalcon@linux.ibm.com \
--to=tlfalcon@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=cforno12@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=dnbanerg@us.ibm.com \
--cc=drt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=ljp@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pradeep@us.ibm.com \
--cc=ricklind@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).