From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Ahern Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: ipv6: put autoconf routes into per-interface tables Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 20:04:36 -0700 Message-ID: <161222cb-5c61-d016-bc0f-2453fb0408b7@cumulusnetworks.com> References: <20170106153026.24785-1-lorenzo@google.com> <37df3b18-d17b-5875-7b44-db40be7b459c@cumulusnetworks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , =?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_=c5=bbenczykowski?= , Hannes Frederic Sowa , Erik Kline , YOSHIFUJI Hideaki , David Miller , Daniel Rosenberg , temnota.am@gmail.com To: Lorenzo Colitti Return-path: Received: from mail-pf0-f178.google.com ([209.85.192.178]:33194 "EHLO mail-pf0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932165AbdAJDEi (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jan 2017 22:04:38 -0500 Received: by mail-pf0-f178.google.com with SMTP id y143so17466640pfb.0 for ; Mon, 09 Jan 2017 19:04:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 1/9/17 7:29 PM, Lorenzo Colitti wrote: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 11:08 AM, David Ahern wrote: >> That's news to me. What about IPv6 and VRF is not working or well-supported? > > I have no firsthand experience of this myself, but if the problems > that Andrey reports above in this thread are real, then those would > indicate that the code is not well-supported. Being unable to accept > DAD is a pretty serious issue. Andrey, what version of the kernel did > you see this on? > Are you referencing an Android or google thread? This patch thread has not mentioned any IPv6 problems. Just a day or so ago I did a dup address test on an interface in a vrf and it worked fine, but perhaps I missed something.