* [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] rework the memory barrier for SCRQ entry
@ 2021-01-30 1:19 Lijun Pan
2021-01-30 1:19 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] ibmvnic: rework to ensure SCRQ entry reads are properly ordered Lijun Pan
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Lijun Pan @ 2021-01-30 1:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: sukadev, drt, brking, dnbanerg, tlfalcon, Lijun Pan
This series rework the memory barrier for SCRQ (Sub-Command-Response
Queue) entry.
v2: send to net-next.
Lijun Pan (2):
ibmvnic: rework to ensure SCRQ entry reads are properly ordered
ibmvnic: remove unnecessary rmb() inside ibmvnic_poll
drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c | 31 +++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
--
2.23.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] ibmvnic: rework to ensure SCRQ entry reads are properly ordered
2021-01-30 1:19 [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] rework the memory barrier for SCRQ entry Lijun Pan
@ 2021-01-30 1:19 ` Lijun Pan
2021-01-30 1:19 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] ibmvnic: remove unnecessary rmb() inside ibmvnic_poll Lijun Pan
2021-02-02 4:30 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] rework the memory barrier for SCRQ entry patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Lijun Pan @ 2021-01-30 1:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: sukadev, drt, brking, dnbanerg, tlfalcon, Lijun Pan
Move the dma_rmb() between pending_scrq() and ibmvnic_next_scrq()
into the end of pending_scrq() to save the duplicated code since
this dma_rmb will be used 3 times.
Signed-off-by: Lijun Pan <ljp@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Falcon <tlfalcon@linux.ibm.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c | 30 +++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
index a40af510018a..331ebca2f57a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
@@ -2444,12 +2444,6 @@ static int ibmvnic_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
if (!pending_scrq(adapter, rx_scrq))
break;
- /* The queue entry at the current index is peeked at above
- * to determine that there is a valid descriptor awaiting
- * processing. We want to be sure that the current slot
- * holds a valid descriptor before reading its contents.
- */
- dma_rmb();
next = ibmvnic_next_scrq(adapter, rx_scrq);
rx_buff =
(struct ibmvnic_rx_buff *)be64_to_cpu(next->
@@ -3189,13 +3183,6 @@ static int ibmvnic_complete_tx(struct ibmvnic_adapter *adapter,
int total_bytes = 0;
int num_packets = 0;
- /* The queue entry at the current index is peeked at above
- * to determine that there is a valid descriptor awaiting
- * processing. We want to be sure that the current slot
- * holds a valid descriptor before reading its contents.
- */
- dma_rmb();
-
next = ibmvnic_next_scrq(adapter, scrq);
for (i = 0; i < next->tx_comp.num_comps; i++) {
if (next->tx_comp.rcs[i])
@@ -3569,11 +3556,16 @@ static int pending_scrq(struct ibmvnic_adapter *adapter,
struct ibmvnic_sub_crq_queue *scrq)
{
union sub_crq *entry = &scrq->msgs[scrq->cur];
+ int rc;
- if (entry->generic.first & IBMVNIC_CRQ_CMD_RSP)
- return 1;
- else
- return 0;
+ rc = !!(entry->generic.first & IBMVNIC_CRQ_CMD_RSP);
+
+ /* Ensure that the SCRQ valid flag is loaded prior to loading the
+ * contents of the SCRQ descriptor
+ */
+ dma_rmb();
+
+ return rc;
}
static union sub_crq *ibmvnic_next_scrq(struct ibmvnic_adapter *adapter,
@@ -3592,8 +3584,8 @@ static union sub_crq *ibmvnic_next_scrq(struct ibmvnic_adapter *adapter,
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&scrq->lock, flags);
- /* Ensure that the entire buffer descriptor has been
- * loaded before reading its contents
+ /* Ensure that the SCRQ valid flag is loaded prior to loading the
+ * contents of the SCRQ descriptor
*/
dma_rmb();
--
2.23.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] ibmvnic: remove unnecessary rmb() inside ibmvnic_poll
2021-01-30 1:19 [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] rework the memory barrier for SCRQ entry Lijun Pan
2021-01-30 1:19 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] ibmvnic: rework to ensure SCRQ entry reads are properly ordered Lijun Pan
@ 2021-01-30 1:19 ` Lijun Pan
2021-02-02 4:30 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] rework the memory barrier for SCRQ entry patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Lijun Pan @ 2021-01-30 1:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: sukadev, drt, brking, dnbanerg, tlfalcon, Lijun Pan
rmb() can be removed since:
1. pending_scrq() has dma_rmb() at the function end;
2. dma_rmb(), though weaker, is enough here.
Signed-off-by: Lijun Pan <ljp@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Dwip Banerjee <dnbanerg@us.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Falcon <tlfalcon@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian King <brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
index 331ebca2f57a..0ed169ef1cfc 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
@@ -2510,7 +2510,6 @@ static int ibmvnic_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
if (napi_complete_done(napi, frames_processed)) {
enable_scrq_irq(adapter, rx_scrq);
if (pending_scrq(adapter, rx_scrq)) {
- rmb();
if (napi_reschedule(napi)) {
disable_scrq_irq(adapter, rx_scrq);
goto restart_poll;
--
2.23.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] rework the memory barrier for SCRQ entry
2021-01-30 1:19 [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] rework the memory barrier for SCRQ entry Lijun Pan
2021-01-30 1:19 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] ibmvnic: rework to ensure SCRQ entry reads are properly ordered Lijun Pan
2021-01-30 1:19 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] ibmvnic: remove unnecessary rmb() inside ibmvnic_poll Lijun Pan
@ 2021-02-02 4:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2021-02-02 4:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lijun Pan; +Cc: netdev, sukadev, drt, brking, dnbanerg, tlfalcon
Hello:
This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (refs/heads/master):
On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 19:19:03 -0600 you wrote:
> This series rework the memory barrier for SCRQ (Sub-Command-Response
> Queue) entry.
>
> v2: send to net-next.
>
> Lijun Pan (2):
> ibmvnic: rework to ensure SCRQ entry reads are properly ordered
> ibmvnic: remove unnecessary rmb() inside ibmvnic_poll
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net-next,v2,1/2] ibmvnic: rework to ensure SCRQ entry reads are properly ordered
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/665ab1eb18d7
- [net-next,v2,2/2] ibmvnic: remove unnecessary rmb() inside ibmvnic_poll
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/2719cb445da5
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-02-02 4:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-01-30 1:19 [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] rework the memory barrier for SCRQ entry Lijun Pan
2021-01-30 1:19 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] ibmvnic: rework to ensure SCRQ entry reads are properly ordered Lijun Pan
2021-01-30 1:19 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] ibmvnic: remove unnecessary rmb() inside ibmvnic_poll Lijun Pan
2021-02-02 4:30 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] rework the memory barrier for SCRQ entry patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).