netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Kev Jackson <foamdino@gmail.com>
Cc: bjorn@kernel.org, magnus.karlsson@intel.com,
	jonathan.lemon@gmail.com, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	andrii@kernel.org, kafai@fb.com, songliubraving@fb.com,
	yhs@fb.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libbpf: Fixes incorrect rx_ring_setup_done
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2021 00:50:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <162311340336.30910.107622073412741714.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YL4aU4f3Aaik7CN0@linux-dev>

Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf.git (refs/heads/master):

On Mon, 7 Jun 2021 14:08:35 +0100 you wrote:
> When calling xsk_socket__create_shared(), the logic at line 1097 marks a
> boolean flag true within the xsk_umem structure to track setup progress
> in order to support multiple calls to the function.  However, instead of
> marking umem->tx_ring_setup_done, the code incorrectly sets
> umem->rx_ring_setup_done.  This leads to improper behaviour when
> creating and destroying xsk and umem structures.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - libbpf: Fixes incorrect rx_ring_setup_done
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/11fc79fc9f2e

You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



      parent reply	other threads:[~2021-06-08  0:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-07 13:08 [PATCH] libbpf: Fixes incorrect rx_ring_setup_done Kev Jackson
2021-06-07 15:04 ` Yonghong Song
2021-06-08  0:45   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-06-08  0:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=162311340336.30910.107622073412741714.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
    --to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=foamdino@gmail.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jonathan.lemon@gmail.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).