Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Hyunwoo Kim <imv4bel@gmail.com>,
	Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@auristor.com>,
	Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>,
	stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 4/4] rxrpc: Fix RESPONSE packet verification to extract skb to a linear buffer
Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 16:25:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1623439.1778685926@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260513131941.1439155-5-dhowells@redhat.com>

David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrote:

> Further, since the way the RESPONSE data is handled is being overhauled,
> add an XDR decode abstraction that hides the details of buffer advancement
> and length checking.  At some point it may be worth seeing if NFS's XDR
> stuff can be used, but that involves linking against the sunrpc module
> which is undesirable.

Can this bit be removed if/when the patch is applied to the networking tree?
As Jeff points out this is no longer true.

David


      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-13 15:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-13 13:19 [PATCH net v2 0/4] rxrpc: Better fix for DATA/RESPONSE decrypt vs splice() David Howells
2026-05-13 13:19 ` [PATCH net v2 1/4] rxrpc: Also unshare DATA/RESPONSE packets when paged frags are present David Howells
2026-05-13 13:19 ` [PATCH net v2 2/4] crypto/krb5, rxrpc: Fix lack of pre-decrypt/pre-verify length checks David Howells
2026-05-13 14:33   ` Jeffrey E Altman
2026-05-13 13:19 ` [PATCH net v2 3/4] rxrpc: Fix DATA decrypt vs splice() by copying data to buffer in recvmsg David Howells
2026-05-13 15:06   ` Jeffrey E Altman
2026-05-13 13:19 ` [PATCH net v2 4/4] rxrpc: Fix RESPONSE packet verification to extract skb to a linear buffer David Howells
2026-05-13 15:04   ` Jeffrey E Altman
2026-05-13 15:25   ` David Howells [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1623439.1778685926@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
    --to=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=imv4bel@gmail.com \
    --cc=jaltman@auristor.com \
    --cc=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.dionne@auristor.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox