From: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
To: mst@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
sgarzare@redhat.com, Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] vringh: Use wiov->used to check for read/write desc order
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 08:55:02 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1624591502-4827-1-git-send-email-neeraju@codeaurora.org> (raw)
As __vringh_iov() traverses a descriptor chain, it populates
each descriptor entry into either read or write vring iov
and increments that iov's ->used member. So, as we iterate
over a descriptor chain, at any point, (riov/wriov)->used
value gives the number of descriptor enteries available,
which are to be read or written by the device. As all read
iovs must precede the write iovs, wiov->used should be zero
when we are traversing a read descriptor. Current code checks
for wiov->i, to figure out whether any previous entry in the
current descriptor chain was a write descriptor. However,
iov->i is only incremented, when these vring iovs are consumed,
at a later point, and remain 0 in __vringh_iov(). So, correct
the check for read and write descriptor order, to use
wiov->used.
Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
---
Changes in v2:
Commit message updated to clarify why wiov->i cannot be used.
drivers/vhost/vringh.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vringh.c b/drivers/vhost/vringh.c
index 4af8fa2..14e2043 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vringh.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vringh.c
@@ -359,7 +359,7 @@ __vringh_iov(struct vringh *vrh, u16 i,
iov = wiov;
else {
iov = riov;
- if (unlikely(wiov && wiov->i)) {
+ if (unlikely(wiov && wiov->used)) {
vringh_bad("Readable desc %p after writable",
&descs[i]);
err = -EINVAL;
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
reply other threads:[~2021-06-25 3:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1624591502-4827-1-git-send-email-neeraju@codeaurora.org \
--to=neeraju@codeaurora.org \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).