From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77004C433F5 for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 09:33:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57B5A6105A for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 09:33:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232098AbhIJJeq (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Sep 2021 05:34:46 -0400 Received: from out30-57.freemail.mail.aliyun.com ([115.124.30.57]:57785 "EHLO out30-57.freemail.mail.aliyun.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231818AbhIJJeo (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Sep 2021 05:34:44 -0400 X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R621e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=e01e04394;MF=yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=9;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0UntYNdL_1631266409; Received: from j63c13417.sqa.eu95.tbsite.net(mailfrom:yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0UntYNdL_1631266409) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Fri, 10 Sep 2021 17:33:31 +0800 From: Yang Li To: kuba@kernel.org Cc: davem@davemloft.net, anna.schumaker@netapp.com, trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com, chuck.lever@oracle.com, bfields@fieldses.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yang Li Subject: [PATCH -next] UNRPC: Return specific error code on kmalloc failure Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 17:33:24 +0800 Message-Id: <1631266404-29698-1-git-send-email-yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org Although the callers of this function only care about whether the return value is null or not, we should still give a rigorous error code. Smatch tool warning: net/sunrpc/auth_gss/svcauth_gss.c:784 gss_write_verf() warn: returning -1 instead of -ENOMEM is sloppy No functional change, just more standardized. Reported-by: Abaci Robot Signed-off-by: Yang Li --- net/sunrpc/auth_gss/svcauth_gss.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/svcauth_gss.c b/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/svcauth_gss.c index 3e776e3..7dba6a9 100644 --- a/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/svcauth_gss.c +++ b/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/svcauth_gss.c @@ -781,7 +781,7 @@ static inline u32 round_up_to_quad(u32 i) svc_putnl(rqstp->rq_res.head, RPC_AUTH_GSS); xdr_seq = kmalloc(4, GFP_KERNEL); if (!xdr_seq) - return -1; + return -ENOMEM; *xdr_seq = htonl(seq); iov.iov_base = xdr_seq; -- 1.8.3.1