From: Antoine Tenart <atenart@kernel.org>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, vladbu@nvidia.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
pshelar@ovn.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/2] net: do not keep the dst cache when uncloning an skb dst and its metadata
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2022 14:44:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <164380949615.380114.13546587453907068231@kwain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8585630f-f68c-ecea-a6b5-9a2ca8323566@iogearbox.net>
Quoting Daniel Borkmann (2022-02-02 13:13:30)
> On 2/2/22 12:01 PM, Antoine Tenart wrote:
> > When uncloning an skb dst and its associated metadata a new dst+metadata
> > is allocated and the tunnel information from the old metadata is copied
> > over there.
> >
> > The issue is the tunnel metadata has references to cached dst, which are
> > copied along the way. When a dst+metadata refcount drops to 0 the
> > metadata is freed including the cached dst entries. As they are also
> > referenced in the initial dst+metadata, this ends up in UaFs.
> >
> > In practice the above did not happen because of another issue, the
> > dst+metadata was never freed because its refcount never dropped to 0
> > (this will be fixed in a subsequent patch).
> >
> > Fix this by initializing the dst cache after copying the tunnel
> > information from the old metadata to also unshare the dst cache.
> >
> > Fixes: d71785ffc7e7 ("net: add dst_cache to ovs vxlan lwtunnel")
> > Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
> > Reported-by: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@nvidia.com>
> > Tested-by: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@nvidia.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Antoine Tenart <atenart@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > include/net/dst_metadata.h | 13 ++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/net/dst_metadata.h b/include/net/dst_metadata.h
> > index 14efa0ded75d..c8f8b7b56bba 100644
> > --- a/include/net/dst_metadata.h
> > +++ b/include/net/dst_metadata.h
> > @@ -110,8 +110,8 @@ static inline struct metadata_dst *tun_rx_dst(int md_size)
> > static inline struct metadata_dst *tun_dst_unclone(struct sk_buff *skb)
> > {
> > struct metadata_dst *md_dst = skb_metadata_dst(skb);
> > - int md_size;
> > struct metadata_dst *new_md;
> > + int md_size, ret;
> >
> > if (!md_dst || md_dst->type != METADATA_IP_TUNNEL)
> > return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> > @@ -123,6 +123,17 @@ static inline struct metadata_dst *tun_dst_unclone(struct sk_buff *skb)
> >
> > memcpy(&new_md->u.tun_info, &md_dst->u.tun_info,
> > sizeof(struct ip_tunnel_info) + md_size);
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_DST_CACHE
> > + ret = dst_cache_init(&new_md->u.tun_info.dst_cache, GFP_ATOMIC);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + /* We can't call metadata_dst_free directly as the still shared
> > + * dst cache would be released.
> > + */
> > + kfree(new_md);
> > + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> > + }
> > +#endif
>
> Could you elaborate (e.g. also in commit message) how this interacts
> or whether it is needed for TUNNEL_NOCACHE users? (Among others,
> latter is used by BPF, for example.)
My understanding is that TUNNEL_NOCACHE is used to decide whether or not
to use a dst cache, that might or might not come from the tunnel info
attached to an skb. The dst cache being allocated in a tunnel info is
orthogonal to the use of TUNNEL_NOCACHE. While looking around I actually
found a code path explicitly setting both, in nft_tunnel_obj_init (that
might need to be investigated though but it is another topic).
It doesn't look like initializing the dst cache would break
TUNNEL_NOCACHE users as ip_tunnel_dst_cache_usable would return false
anyway. Having said that, we probably want to unshare the dst cache only
if there is one already, checking for
'md_dst->u.tun_info.dst_cache.cache != NULL' first.
Does that make sense?
Thanks!
Antoine
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-02 13:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-02 11:01 [PATCH net 0/2] net: fix issues when uncloning an skb dst+metadata Antoine Tenart
2022-02-02 11:01 ` [PATCH net 1/2] net: do not keep the dst cache when uncloning an skb dst and its metadata Antoine Tenart
2022-02-02 11:17 ` Antoine Tenart
2022-02-02 12:13 ` Daniel Borkmann
2022-02-02 13:44 ` Antoine Tenart [this message]
2022-02-04 12:33 ` Daniel Borkmann
2022-02-04 16:19 ` Antoine Tenart
2022-02-02 14:24 ` Paolo Abeni
2022-02-02 14:29 ` Antoine Tenart
2022-02-02 11:01 ` [PATCH net 2/2] net: fix a memleak " Antoine Tenart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=164380949615.380114.13546587453907068231@kwain \
--to=atenart@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pshelar@ovn.org \
--cc=vladbu@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox