netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] selftests: net: fix warning when compiling selftest/net
@ 2022-03-16 11:50 Guo Zhengkui
  2022-03-17  3:22 ` Jakub Kicinski
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Guo Zhengkui @ 2022-03-16 11:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David S. Miller, Jakub Kicinski, Shuah Khan,
	open list:NETWORKING [GENERAL],
	open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK, open list
  Cc: zhengkui_guo, Guo Zhengkui

When I compile tools/testing/selftests/net/ by
`make -C tools/testing/selftests/net` with gcc (Debian 8.3.0-6) 8.3.0,
it reports the following warnings:

txtimestamp.c: In function 'validate_timestamp':
txtimestamp.c:164:29: warning: format '%lu' expects argument of type
'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'int64_t'
{aka 'long long int'} [-Wformat=]
   fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: %lu us expected between %d and %d\n",
                           ~~^
                           %llu
     cur64 - start64, min_delay, max_delay);
     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
txtimestamp.c: In function '__print_ts_delta_formatted':
txtimestamp.c:173:22: warning: format '%lu' expects argument of type
'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'int64_t'
{aka 'long long int'} [-Wformat=]
   fprintf(stderr, "%lu ns", ts_delta);
                    ~~^      ~~~~~~~~
                    %llu
txtimestamp.c:175:22: warning: format '%lu' expects argument of type
'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'int64_t'
{aka 'long long int'} [-Wformat=]
   fprintf(stderr, "%lu us", ts_delta / NSEC_PER_USEC);
                    ~~^
                    %llu

`int64_t` is the alias for `long long int`. '%lld' is more suitable.

Signed-off-by: Guo Zhengkui <guozhengkui@vivo.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/net/txtimestamp.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/txtimestamp.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/txtimestamp.c
index fabb1d555ee5..ab8d0181218f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/txtimestamp.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/txtimestamp.c
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ static void validate_timestamp(struct timespec *cur, int min_delay)
 	max_delay = min_delay + cfg_delay_tolerance_usec;
 
 	if (cur64 < start64 + min_delay || cur64 > start64 + max_delay) {
-		fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: %lu us expected between %d and %d\n",
+		fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: %lld us expected between %d and %d\n",
 				cur64 - start64, min_delay, max_delay);
 		test_failed = true;
 	}
@@ -170,9 +170,9 @@ static void validate_timestamp(struct timespec *cur, int min_delay)
 static void __print_ts_delta_formatted(int64_t ts_delta)
 {
 	if (cfg_print_nsec)
-		fprintf(stderr, "%lu ns", ts_delta);
+		fprintf(stderr, "%lld ns", ts_delta);
 	else
-		fprintf(stderr, "%lu us", ts_delta / NSEC_PER_USEC);
+		fprintf(stderr, "%lld us", ts_delta / NSEC_PER_USEC);
 }
 
 static void __print_timestamp(const char *name, struct timespec *cur,
-- 
2.20.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] selftests: net: fix warning when compiling selftest/net
  2022-03-16 11:50 [PATCH] selftests: net: fix warning when compiling selftest/net Guo Zhengkui
@ 2022-03-17  3:22 ` Jakub Kicinski
  2022-03-17  6:51   ` Guo Zhengkui
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2022-03-17  3:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Guo Zhengkui
  Cc: David S. Miller, Shuah Khan, open list:NETWORKING [GENERAL],
	open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK, open list, zhengkui_guo

On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 19:50:40 +0800 Guo Zhengkui wrote:
> When I compile tools/testing/selftests/net/ by
> `make -C tools/testing/selftests/net` with gcc (Debian 8.3.0-6) 8.3.0,
> it reports the following warnings:
> 
> txtimestamp.c: In function 'validate_timestamp':
> txtimestamp.c:164:29: warning: format '%lu' expects argument of type
> 'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'int64_t'
> {aka 'long long int'} [-Wformat=]
>    fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: %lu us expected between %d and %d\n",
>                            ~~^
>                            %llu
>      cur64 - start64, min_delay, max_delay);
>      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> txtimestamp.c: In function '__print_ts_delta_formatted':
> txtimestamp.c:173:22: warning: format '%lu' expects argument of type
> 'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'int64_t'
> {aka 'long long int'} [-Wformat=]
>    fprintf(stderr, "%lu ns", ts_delta);
>                     ~~^      ~~~~~~~~
>                     %llu
> txtimestamp.c:175:22: warning: format '%lu' expects argument of type
> 'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'int64_t'
> {aka 'long long int'} [-Wformat=]
>    fprintf(stderr, "%lu us", ts_delta / NSEC_PER_USEC);
>                     ~~^
>                     %llu
> 
> `int64_t` is the alias for `long long int`. '%lld' is more suitable.

That's on 32bit machines, I think what you need to use is PRId64.
Or just cast the result / change variable types to long long.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] selftests: net: fix warning when compiling selftest/net
  2022-03-17  3:22 ` Jakub Kicinski
@ 2022-03-17  6:51   ` Guo Zhengkui
  2022-03-18  7:50     ` [PATCH linux-next v2] selftests: net: change fprintf format specifiers Guo Zhengkui
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Guo Zhengkui @ 2022-03-17  6:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jakub Kicinski
  Cc: David S. Miller, Shuah Khan, open list:NETWORKING [GENERAL],
	open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK, open list,
	zhengkui_guo@outlook.com

On 2022/3/17 11:22, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 19:50:40 +0800 Guo Zhengkui wrote:
>> When I compile tools/testing/selftests/net/ by
>> `make -C tools/testing/selftests/net` with gcc (Debian 8.3.0-6) 8.3.0,
>> it reports the following warnings:
>>
>> txtimestamp.c: In function 'validate_timestamp':
>> txtimestamp.c:164:29: warning: format '%lu' expects argument of type
>> 'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'int64_t'
>> {aka 'long long int'} [-Wformat=]
>>     fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: %lu us expected between %d and %d\n",
>>                             ~~^
>>                             %llu
>>       cur64 - start64, min_delay, max_delay);
>>       ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> txtimestamp.c: In function '__print_ts_delta_formatted':
>> txtimestamp.c:173:22: warning: format '%lu' expects argument of type
>> 'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'int64_t'
>> {aka 'long long int'} [-Wformat=]
>>     fprintf(stderr, "%lu ns", ts_delta);
>>                      ~~^      ~~~~~~~~
>>                      %llu
>> txtimestamp.c:175:22: warning: format '%lu' expects argument of type
>> 'long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'int64_t'
>> {aka 'long long int'} [-Wformat=]
>>     fprintf(stderr, "%lu us", ts_delta / NSEC_PER_USEC);
>>                      ~~^
>>                      %llu
>>
>> `int64_t` is the alias for `long long int`. '%lld' is more suitable.
> 
> That's on 32bit machines, I think what you need to use is PRId64.
> Or just cast the result / change variable types to long long.

But it should be '%ld' instead of '%lu', right?

Zhengkui


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [PATCH linux-next v2] selftests: net: change fprintf format specifiers
  2022-03-17  6:51   ` Guo Zhengkui
@ 2022-03-18  7:50     ` Guo Zhengkui
  2022-03-18 16:33       ` Jakub Kicinski
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Guo Zhengkui @ 2022-03-18  7:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David S. Miller, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Shuah Khan,
	open list:NETWORKING [GENERAL],
	open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK, open list
  Cc: zhengkui_guo, Guo Zhengkui

`cur64`, `start64` and `ts_delta` are int64_t. Change
format specifiers in fprintf from '%lu' to '%ld'.

It has been tested with gcc (Ubuntu 7.5.0-3ubuntu1~18.04) 7.5.0
on x86_64.

Signed-off-by: Guo Zhengkui <guozhengkui@vivo.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/net/txtimestamp.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/txtimestamp.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/txtimestamp.c
index fabb1d555ee5..b8a52995a635 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/txtimestamp.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/txtimestamp.c
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ static void validate_timestamp(struct timespec *cur, int min_delay)
 	max_delay = min_delay + cfg_delay_tolerance_usec;
 
 	if (cur64 < start64 + min_delay || cur64 > start64 + max_delay) {
-		fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: %lu us expected between %d and %d\n",
+		fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: %ld us expected between %d and %d\n",
 				cur64 - start64, min_delay, max_delay);
 		test_failed = true;
 	}
@@ -170,9 +170,9 @@ static void validate_timestamp(struct timespec *cur, int min_delay)
 static void __print_ts_delta_formatted(int64_t ts_delta)
 {
 	if (cfg_print_nsec)
-		fprintf(stderr, "%lu ns", ts_delta);
+		fprintf(stderr, "%ld ns", ts_delta);
 	else
-		fprintf(stderr, "%lu us", ts_delta / NSEC_PER_USEC);
+		fprintf(stderr, "%ld us", ts_delta / NSEC_PER_USEC);
 }
 
 static void __print_timestamp(const char *name, struct timespec *cur,
-- 
2.17.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH linux-next v2] selftests: net: change fprintf format specifiers
  2022-03-18  7:50     ` [PATCH linux-next v2] selftests: net: change fprintf format specifiers Guo Zhengkui
@ 2022-03-18 16:33       ` Jakub Kicinski
  2022-03-19  7:09         ` Guo Zhengkui
  2022-03-19  7:37         ` [PATCH linux-next v3] " Guo Zhengkui
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2022-03-18 16:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Guo Zhengkui
  Cc: David S. Miller, Paolo Abeni, Shuah Khan,
	open list:NETWORKING [GENERAL],
	open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK, open list, zhengkui_guo

On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 15:50:13 +0800 Guo Zhengkui wrote:
> `cur64`, `start64` and `ts_delta` are int64_t. Change
> format specifiers in fprintf from '%lu' to '%ld'.
> 
> It has been tested with gcc (Ubuntu 7.5.0-3ubuntu1~18.04) 7.5.0
> on x86_64.

No, not like that. Please read up on printing int64_t.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH linux-next v2] selftests: net: change fprintf format specifiers
  2022-03-18 16:33       ` Jakub Kicinski
@ 2022-03-19  7:09         ` Guo Zhengkui
  2022-03-19  7:37         ` [PATCH linux-next v3] " Guo Zhengkui
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Guo Zhengkui @ 2022-03-19  7:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jakub Kicinski
  Cc: David S. Miller, Paolo Abeni, Shuah Khan,
	open list:NETWORKING [GENERAL],
	open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK, open list,
	zhengkui_guo@outlook.com

On 2022/3/19 0:33, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 15:50:13 +0800 Guo Zhengkui wrote:
>> `cur64`, `start64` and `ts_delta` are int64_t. Change
>> format specifiers in fprintf from '%lu' to '%ld'.
>>
>> It has been tested with gcc (Ubuntu 7.5.0-3ubuntu1~18.04) 7.5.0
>> on x86_64.
> 
> No, not like that. Please read up on printing int64_t.

Sorry for misunderstanding. I wrongly thought that it's just for 64-bit.

So I should use `PRId64`.

Zhengkui

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [PATCH linux-next v3] selftests: net: change fprintf format specifiers
  2022-03-18 16:33       ` Jakub Kicinski
  2022-03-19  7:09         ` Guo Zhengkui
@ 2022-03-19  7:37         ` Guo Zhengkui
  2022-03-22  0:00           ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Guo Zhengkui @ 2022-03-19  7:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David S. Miller, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Shuah Khan,
	open list:NETWORKING [GENERAL],
	open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK, open list
  Cc: zhengkui_guo, Guo Zhengkui

`cur64`, `start64` and `ts_delta` are int64_t. Change format
specifiers in fprintf from `"%lu"` to `"%" PRId64` to adapt
to 32-bit and 64-bit systems.

Signed-off-by: Guo Zhengkui <guozhengkui@vivo.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/net/txtimestamp.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/txtimestamp.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/txtimestamp.c
index fabb1d555ee5..10f2fde3686b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/txtimestamp.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/txtimestamp.c
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ static void validate_timestamp(struct timespec *cur, int min_delay)
 	max_delay = min_delay + cfg_delay_tolerance_usec;
 
 	if (cur64 < start64 + min_delay || cur64 > start64 + max_delay) {
-		fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: %lu us expected between %d and %d\n",
+		fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: %" PRId64 " us expected between %d and %d\n",
 				cur64 - start64, min_delay, max_delay);
 		test_failed = true;
 	}
@@ -170,9 +170,9 @@ static void validate_timestamp(struct timespec *cur, int min_delay)
 static void __print_ts_delta_formatted(int64_t ts_delta)
 {
 	if (cfg_print_nsec)
-		fprintf(stderr, "%lu ns", ts_delta);
+		fprintf(stderr, "%" PRId64 " ns", ts_delta);
 	else
-		fprintf(stderr, "%lu us", ts_delta / NSEC_PER_USEC);
+		fprintf(stderr, "%" PRId64 " us", ts_delta / NSEC_PER_USEC);
 }
 
 static void __print_timestamp(const char *name, struct timespec *cur,
-- 
2.20.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH linux-next v3] selftests: net: change fprintf format specifiers
  2022-03-19  7:37         ` [PATCH linux-next v3] " Guo Zhengkui
@ 2022-03-22  0:00           ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2022-03-22  0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Guo Zhengkui
  Cc: davem, kuba, pabeni, shuah, netdev, linux-kselftest, linux-kernel,
	zhengkui_guo

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (master)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:

On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 15:37:30 +0800 you wrote:
> `cur64`, `start64` and `ts_delta` are int64_t. Change format
> specifiers in fprintf from `"%lu"` to `"%" PRId64` to adapt
> to 32-bit and 64-bit systems.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Guo Zhengkui <guozhengkui@vivo.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/net/txtimestamp.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Here is the summary with links:
  - [linux-next,v3] selftests: net: change fprintf format specifiers
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/94f19e1ec38f

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-03-22  0:01 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-03-16 11:50 [PATCH] selftests: net: fix warning when compiling selftest/net Guo Zhengkui
2022-03-17  3:22 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-17  6:51   ` Guo Zhengkui
2022-03-18  7:50     ` [PATCH linux-next v2] selftests: net: change fprintf format specifiers Guo Zhengkui
2022-03-18 16:33       ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-19  7:09         ` Guo Zhengkui
2022-03-19  7:37         ` [PATCH linux-next v3] " Guo Zhengkui
2022-03-22  0:00           ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).