From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] rethook: Reject getting a rethook if RCU is not watching
Date: Sat, 7 May 2022 13:46:52 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <165189881197.175864.14757002789194211860.stgit@devnote2> (raw)
Since the rethook_recycle() will involve the call_rcu() for reclaiming
the rethook_instance, the rethook must be set up at the RCU available
context (non idle). This rethook_recycle() in the rethook trampoline
handler is inevitable, thus the RCU available check must be done before
setting the rethook trampoline.
This adds a rcu_is_watching() check in the rethook_try_get() so that
it will return NULL if it is called when !rcu_is_watching().
Fixes: 54ecbe6f1ed5 ("rethook: Add a generic return hook")
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
---
kernel/trace/rethook.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/rethook.c b/kernel/trace/rethook.c
index b56833700d23..c69d82273ce7 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/rethook.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/rethook.c
@@ -154,6 +154,15 @@ struct rethook_node *rethook_try_get(struct rethook *rh)
if (unlikely(!handler))
return NULL;
+ /*
+ * This expects the caller will set up a rethook on a function entry.
+ * When the function returns, the rethook will eventually be reclaimed
+ * or released in the rethook_recycle() with call_rcu().
+ * This means the caller must be run in the RCU-availabe context.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(!rcu_is_watching()))
+ return NULL;
+
fn = freelist_try_get(&rh->pool);
if (!fn)
return NULL;
next reply other threads:[~2022-05-07 4:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-07 4:46 Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2022-05-24 23:23 ` [PATCH] rethook: Reject getting a rethook if RCU is not watching Steven Rostedt
2022-05-26 14:25 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-05-26 14:49 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-05-26 16:14 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-05-27 22:10 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-05-28 1:19 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2022-06-03 19:21 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-06-06 16:02 ` Masami Hiramatsu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=165189881197.175864.14757002789194211860.stgit@devnote2 \
--to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).