public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@canonical.com>
To: zyjzyj2000@gmail.com
Cc: emil.s.tantilov@intel.com, mkubecek@suse.cz, vfalico@gmail.com,
	gospo@cumulusnetworks.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	boris.shteinbock@windriver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] bonding: restrict up state in 802.3ad mode
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 22:33:41 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <16587.1452148421@famine> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1452147313-22886-1-git-send-email-zyjzyj2000@gmail.com>

<zyjzyj2000@gmail.com> wrote:

>From: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@windriver.com>
>
>In 802.3ad mode, the speed and duplex is needed. But in some NIC,
>there is a time span between NIC up state and getting speed and duplex.
>As such, sometimes a slave in 802.3ad mode is in up state without
>speed and duplex. This will make bonding in 802.3ad mode can not
>work well.

	From my reading of Emil's comments in the discussion, I'm not
sure the above is an accurate description of the problem.  If I'm
understanding correctly, the cause is due to link flaps racing with the
bonding monitor workqueue polling the state.  Is this correct?

>To make bonding driver be compatible with more NICs, it is
>necessary to restrict the up state in 802.3ad mode.
>
>Signed-off-by: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@windriver.com>
>---
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c |   11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>index 09f8a48..7df8af5 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>@@ -1991,6 +1991,17 @@ static int bond_miimon_inspect(struct bonding *bond)
> 
> 		link_state = bond_check_dev_link(bond, slave->dev, 0);
> 
>+		if ((BMSR_LSTATUS == link_state) &&
>+		    (BOND_MODE(bond) == BOND_MODE_8023AD)) {
>+			rtnl_lock();
>+			bond_update_speed_duplex(slave);
>+			rtnl_unlock();

	This will add a round trip on the RTNL mutex for every miimon
interval when the slave is carrier up.  At common miimon rates (10 - 50
ms), this will hit RTNL between 20 and 100 times per second.  I do not
see how this is acceptable.

	I believe the proper solution here is to supplant the periodic
miimon polling from bonding with link state detection based on notifiers
(As Stephen suggested, not for the first time).

	My suggestion is to have bonding set slave link state based on
notifiers if miimon is set to zero, and poll as usual if it is not.
This would preserve any backwards compatibility with any device out
there that might possibly still be doing netif_carrier_on/off
incorrectly or not at all.  The only minor complication is synchronizing
notifier carrier state detection with the ARP monitor.

	This should have been done a long time ago; I'll work something
up tomorrow (it's late here right now) and post a patch for testing.

	-J

>+			if ((slave->speed == SPEED_UNKNOWN) ||
>+			    (slave->duplex == DUPLEX_UNKNOWN)) {
>+				link_state = 0;
>+				netdev_info(bond->dev, "In 802.3ad mode, it is not enough to up without speed and duplex");
>+			}
>+		}
> 		switch (slave->link) {
> 		case BOND_LINK_UP:
> 			if (link_state)
>-- 
>1.7.9.5
>

---
	-Jay Vosburgh, jay.vosburgh@canonical.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-01-07  6:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-17  8:03 [PATCH 1/1] bonding: restrict up state in 802.3ad mode zyjzyj2000
2015-12-17 21:57 ` Jay Vosburgh
2015-12-18  4:36   ` zyjzyj2000
2015-12-18  4:36     ` [PATCH 1/1] bonding: delay up state without speed and duplex " zyjzyj2000
2015-12-18  4:54       ` Jay Vosburgh
2015-12-18 13:37       ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-12-28  8:43   ` [PATCH 1/1] bonding: restrict up state " Michal Kubecek
2015-12-28  9:19     ` zhuyj
2016-01-06  1:26       ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-06  3:05         ` zhuyj
2016-01-07  2:43           ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-07  3:33             ` zhuyj
2016-01-07  5:02               ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-07  6:15                 ` zyjzyj2000
2016-01-07  6:22                   ` zhuyj
2016-01-07  6:33                   ` Jay Vosburgh [this message]
2016-01-07 15:27                     ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-08  1:28                     ` [RFC PATCH net-next] bonding: Use notifiers for slave link state detection Jay Vosburgh
2016-01-08  4:36                       ` zhuyj
2016-01-08  6:12                         ` Jay Vosburgh
2016-01-08  7:41                           ` (unknown), zyjzyj2000
2016-01-08  7:41                             ` [PATCH 1/1] bonding: utilize notifier callbacks to detect slave link state changes zyjzyj2000
2016-01-08 10:18                               ` zhuyj
2016-01-09  1:35                       ` [RFC PATCH net-next] bonding: Use notifiers for slave link state detection Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-09  2:19                         ` Jay Vosburgh
2016-01-11  9:03                           ` zhuyj
2016-01-13  2:54                             ` zhuyj
2016-01-13 17:03                           ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-20  5:13                             ` [PATCH 1/1] " zyjzyj2000
2016-01-20  5:13                               ` zyjzyj2000
2016-01-21 10:16                             ` zyjzyj2000
2016-01-21 10:16                               ` zyjzyj2000
2016-01-25 16:37                                 ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-26  0:43                                 ` Jay Vosburgh
2016-01-26  3:19                                   ` zhuyj
2016-01-26  6:00                                     ` Jay Vosburgh
2016-01-26  6:26                                       ` zhuyj
2016-01-26  6:45                                         ` zhuyj
2016-01-27 20:00                                       ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-28  8:44                                         ` zyjzyj2000
2016-01-29  7:05                                       ` zhuyj
2016-01-25 16:33                               ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-25 18:00                                 ` David Miller
2016-01-25 18:37                                   ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-08  2:29                     ` [PATCH 1/1] bonding: restrict up state in 802.3ad mode zhuyj
2016-01-07  6:53                   ` Michal Kubecek
2016-01-07  7:37                     ` zhuyj
2016-01-07  7:59                       ` Michal Kubecek
2016-01-07  8:35                         ` zhuyj
2016-01-07  7:47             ` zhuyj
2016-01-07 18:28               ` Tantilov, Emil S
2016-01-08  6:09                 ` zhuyj
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-01-07  6:13 zyjzyj2000

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=16587.1452148421@famine \
    --to=jay.vosburgh@canonical.com \
    --cc=boris.shteinbock@windriver.com \
    --cc=emil.s.tantilov@intel.com \
    --cc=gospo@cumulusnetworks.com \
    --cc=mkubecek@suse.cz \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vfalico@gmail.com \
    --cc=zyjzyj2000@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox