From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5D3AC61DA7 for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2023 08:40:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234081AbjA1Ikw (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Jan 2023 03:40:52 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36440 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234091AbjA1Ikt (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Jan 2023 03:40:49 -0500 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [145.40.68.75]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 475D9908D5 for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2023 00:40:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBD03B81239 for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2023 08:40:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97EDAC4339B; Sat, 28 Jan 2023 08:40:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1674895231; bh=fEhyk81SDnYWxOo+fwtvOfwberNeKTh/9PPm1JgzvTY=; h=Subject:From:Date:References:In-Reply-To:To:Cc:From; b=W6s6bThjkRHBMCF5NIMBZLg8MHuAGSLLCrOsrA1iz7czb13QXCyYo0e11YkGivM12 jxyk9pxOpplhwHhGs/efZfvjXHixD5aRG6pITUc2Tqze9FlrFvB8jnEYhDRG5exTdQ 1pT+2oglHSZfNz13+eQ3v/dn6MeVmF3HbWi2WSJxqISQ3RhXE/eGRCgfrgtTn/8hAi VCupzKji6g6VIxjBWtiADyaK9MnQtSD5Dq/SYddRQRJGtOr2K6YnJ+h28R02MJkHgo +vDETcEcx8lXYaDII4pkV59xcaLKaGHcKAs7vabDgGgJUfdyDOEU2SWCkCbLQvVhLN MJtjm4wzjkbdA== Received: from aws-us-west-2-korg-oddjob-1.ci.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by aws-us-west-2-korg-oddjob-1.ci.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86CA9E54D2D; Sat, 28 Jan 2023 08:40:31 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: netlink: recommend policy range validation From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Message-Id: <167489523154.20245.2288032415564432661.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2023 08:40:31 +0000 References: <20230127084506.09f280619d64.I5dece85f06efa8ab0f474ca77df9e26d3553d4ab@changeid> In-Reply-To: <20230127084506.09f280619d64.I5dece85f06efa8ab0f474ca77df9e26d3553d4ab@changeid> To: Johannes Berg Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, johannes.berg@intel.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org Hello: This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (master) by Jakub Kicinski : On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 08:45:06 +0100 you wrote: > From: Johannes Berg > > For large ranges (outside of s16) the documentation currently > recommends open-coding the validation, but it's better to use > the NLA_POLICY_FULL_RANGE() or NLA_POLICY_FULL_RANGE_SIGNED() > policy validation instead; recommend that. > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [net-next] net: netlink: recommend policy range validation https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/70eb3911d80f You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html