netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
	kernelxing@tencent.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	eric.dumazet@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] net: rps/rfs improvements
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 12:00:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <168017761889.14481.3652625864507169315.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230328235021.1048163-1-edumazet@google.com>

Hello:

This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>:

On Tue, 28 Mar 2023 23:50:17 +0000 you wrote:
> Jason Xing attempted to optimize napi_schedule_rps() by avoiding
> unneeded NET_RX_SOFTIRQ raises: [1], [2]
> 
> This is quite complex to implement properly. I chose to implement
> the idea, and added a similar optimization in ____napi_schedule()
> 
> Overall, in an intensive RPC workload, with 32 TX/RX queues with RFS
> I was able to observe a ~10% reduction of NET_RX_SOFTIRQ
> invocations.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net-next,1/4] net: napi_schedule_rps() cleanup
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/8fcb76b934da
  - [net-next,2/4] net: add softnet_data.in_net_rx_action
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/c59647c0dc67
  - [net-next,3/4] net: optimize napi_schedule_rps()
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/821eba962d95
  - [net-next,4/4] net: optimize ____napi_schedule() to avoid extra NET_RX_SOFTIRQ
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/8b43fd3d1d7d

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-03-30 12:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-28 23:50 [PATCH net-next 0/4] net: rps/rfs improvements Eric Dumazet
2023-03-28 23:50 ` [PATCH net-next 1/4] net: napi_schedule_rps() cleanup Eric Dumazet
2023-03-28 23:50 ` [PATCH net-next 2/4] net: add softnet_data.in_net_rx_action Eric Dumazet
2023-03-28 23:50 ` [PATCH net-next 3/4] net: optimize napi_schedule_rps() Eric Dumazet
2023-03-28 23:50 ` [PATCH net-next 4/4] net: optimize ____napi_schedule() to avoid extra NET_RX_SOFTIRQ Eric Dumazet
2023-03-29 12:47   ` Yunsheng Lin
2023-03-29 15:47     ` Eric Dumazet
2023-03-30  2:33       ` Yunsheng Lin
2023-03-30  2:57         ` Eric Dumazet
2023-03-30  6:47           ` Yunsheng Lin
2023-03-30  7:36             ` Yunsheng Lin
2023-03-30  9:50   ` Jason Xing
2023-03-30 11:39     ` Paolo Abeni
2023-03-30 11:44       ` Eric Dumazet
2023-03-30 12:03       ` Jason Xing
2023-03-29  2:40 ` [PATCH net-next 0/4] net: rps/rfs improvements Jason Xing
2023-03-30  3:04 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-03-30  3:15   ` Eric Dumazet
2023-03-30  3:39     ` Eric Dumazet
2023-03-30  3:57       ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-03-30 12:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-03-29 13:17 Aiden Leong
2023-03-29 13:18 ` Aiden Leong
2023-03-29 15:33   ` Eric Dumazet
2023-03-29 16:21     ` Jason Xing

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=168017761889.14481.3652625864507169315.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
    --to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernelxing@tencent.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).