From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@vmware.com>
Subject: Re: [Pv-drivers] [PATCH 0/6] VSOCK for Linux upstreaming
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 17:41:44 -0800
Message-ID: <1683801.VNKd61ZM1Q@dtor-d630.eng.vmware.com>
References: <20130108235633.3719.6085.stgit@promb-2n-dhcp175.eng.vmware.com>
	<20130109002110.GB5296@kroah.com>
	<20130108.173056.1029788106028104571.davem@davemloft.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: pv-drivers@vmware.com
Return-path: <virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20130108.173056.1029788106028104571.davem@davemloft.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/virtualization>,
	<mailto:virtualization-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/>
List-Post: <mailto:virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:virtualization-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization>,
	<mailto:virtualization-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org
Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Tuesday, January 08, 2013 05:30:56 PM David Miller wrote:
> From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 16:21:10 -0800
> 
> > On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 03:59:08PM -0800, George Zhang wrote:
> >> * * *
> >> 
> >> This series of VSOCK linux upstreaming patches include latest udpate from
> >> VMware to address Greg's and all other's code review comments.
> > 
> > Dave, you acked these patches a while ago,
> 
> Really?  I'd like to see where I did that.
> 
> Instead, what I remember doing was deferring to the feedback these
> folks received, stating that ideas that the virtio people had
> mentioned should be considered instead.
> 
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=135301515818462&w=2

I believe Andy replied to Anthony's AF_VMCHANNEL post and the differences
between the proposed solutions.

> 
> So definitely NACK this code and any infrastructure you've
> merged which essentialy depends upon it.

No, there is no infrastructure that depends on VSOCK, as VSOCK is built
on top of VMCI, not the other way around.

Thanks,
Dmitry