From: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
To: kgraul@linux.ibm.com, wenjia@linux.ibm.com, jaka@linux.ibm.com
Cc: kuba@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
"D. Wythe" <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: [RFC net-next 1/2] net/smc: refactoring lgr pending lock
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2023 21:55:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1694008530-85087-2-git-send-email-alibuda@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1694008530-85087-1-git-send-email-alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
From: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
This patch replaces the locking and unlocking of lgr pending with
a unified inline function, and since the granularity of lgr pending
lock is within the lifecycle of init_info, which make it possible
to record the lock state on init_info. So that other routines can
unlock lgr pending lock safely.
Signed-off-by: D. Wythe <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
---
net/smc/af_smc.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
net/smc/smc_core.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c
index bacdd97..52a987b 100644
--- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
+++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
@@ -1251,10 +1251,10 @@ static int smc_connect_rdma(struct smc_sock *smc,
if (reason_code)
return reason_code;
- mutex_lock(&smc_client_lgr_pending);
+ smc_lgr_pending_lock(ini, &smc_client_lgr_pending);
reason_code = smc_conn_create(smc, ini);
if (reason_code) {
- mutex_unlock(&smc_client_lgr_pending);
+ smc_lgr_pending_unlock(ini, &smc_client_lgr_pending);
return reason_code;
}
@@ -1346,7 +1346,7 @@ static int smc_connect_rdma(struct smc_sock *smc,
if (reason_code)
goto connect_abort;
}
- mutex_unlock(&smc_client_lgr_pending);
+ smc_lgr_pending_unlock(ini, &smc_client_lgr_pending);
smc_copy_sock_settings_to_clc(smc);
smc->connect_nonblock = 0;
@@ -1356,7 +1356,7 @@ static int smc_connect_rdma(struct smc_sock *smc,
return 0;
connect_abort:
smc_conn_abort(smc, ini->first_contact_local);
- mutex_unlock(&smc_client_lgr_pending);
+ smc_lgr_pending_unlock(ini, &smc_client_lgr_pending);
smc->connect_nonblock = 0;
return reason_code;
@@ -1413,10 +1413,10 @@ static int smc_connect_ism(struct smc_sock *smc,
ini->ism_peer_gid[ini->ism_selected] = aclc->d0.gid;
/* there is only one lgr role for SMC-D; use server lock */
- mutex_lock(&smc_server_lgr_pending);
+ smc_lgr_pending_lock(ini, &smc_server_lgr_pending);
rc = smc_conn_create(smc, ini);
if (rc) {
- mutex_unlock(&smc_server_lgr_pending);
+ smc_lgr_pending_unlock(ini, &smc_server_lgr_pending);
return rc;
}
@@ -1443,7 +1443,7 @@ static int smc_connect_ism(struct smc_sock *smc,
aclc->hdr.version, eid, ini);
if (rc)
goto connect_abort;
- mutex_unlock(&smc_server_lgr_pending);
+ smc_lgr_pending_unlock(ini, &smc_server_lgr_pending);
smc_copy_sock_settings_to_clc(smc);
smc->connect_nonblock = 0;
@@ -1453,7 +1453,7 @@ static int smc_connect_ism(struct smc_sock *smc,
return 0;
connect_abort:
smc_conn_abort(smc, ini->first_contact_local);
- mutex_unlock(&smc_server_lgr_pending);
+ smc_lgr_pending_unlock(ini, &smc_server_lgr_pending);
smc->connect_nonblock = 0;
return rc;
@@ -2460,7 +2460,7 @@ static void smc_listen_work(struct work_struct *work)
if (rc)
goto out_decl;
- mutex_lock(&smc_server_lgr_pending);
+ smc_lgr_pending_lock(ini, &smc_server_lgr_pending);
smc_close_init(new_smc);
smc_rx_init(new_smc);
smc_tx_init(new_smc);
@@ -2479,7 +2479,7 @@ static void smc_listen_work(struct work_struct *work)
/* SMC-D does not need this lock any more */
if (ini->is_smcd)
- mutex_unlock(&smc_server_lgr_pending);
+ smc_lgr_pending_unlock(ini, &smc_server_lgr_pending);
/* receive SMC Confirm CLC message */
memset(buf, 0, sizeof(*buf));
@@ -2510,7 +2510,7 @@ static void smc_listen_work(struct work_struct *work)
ini->first_contact_local, ini);
if (rc)
goto out_unlock;
- mutex_unlock(&smc_server_lgr_pending);
+ smc_lgr_pending_unlock(ini, &smc_server_lgr_pending);
}
smc_conn_save_peer_info(new_smc, cclc);
smc_listen_out_connected(new_smc);
@@ -2518,7 +2518,7 @@ static void smc_listen_work(struct work_struct *work)
goto out_free;
out_unlock:
- mutex_unlock(&smc_server_lgr_pending);
+ smc_lgr_pending_unlock(ini, &smc_server_lgr_pending);
out_decl:
smc_listen_decline(new_smc, rc, ini ? ini->first_contact_local : 0,
proposal_version);
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_core.h b/net/smc/smc_core.h
index 120027d..6f309a3 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_core.h
+++ b/net/smc/smc_core.h
@@ -422,6 +422,8 @@ struct smc_init_info {
u8 ism_offered_cnt; /* # of ISM devices offered */
u8 ism_selected; /* index of selected ISM dev*/
u8 smcd_version;
+ /* mutex holding for conn create */
+ struct mutex *mutex;
};
/* Find the connection associated with the given alert token in the link group.
@@ -589,6 +591,25 @@ struct smc_link *smc_switch_conns(struct smc_link_group *lgr,
int smcr_nl_get_link(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb);
int smcd_nl_get_lgr(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb);
+static inline void smc_lgr_pending_lock(struct smc_init_info *ini, struct mutex *lock)
+{
+ if (unlikely(ini->mutex))
+ pr_warn_once("smc: lgr pending deadlock dected.");
+
+ mutex_lock(lock);
+ ini->mutex = lock;
+}
+
+static inline void smc_lgr_pending_unlock(struct smc_init_info *ini, struct mutex *lock)
+{
+ /* already unlock it */
+ if (!ini->mutex)
+ return;
+
+ ini->mutex = NULL;
+ mutex_unlock(lock);
+}
+
static inline struct smc_link_group *smc_get_lgr(struct smc_link *link)
{
return link->lgr;
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-06 13:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-06 13:55 [RFC net-next 0/2] Optimize the parallelism of SMC-R connections D. Wythe
2023-09-06 13:55 ` D. Wythe [this message]
2023-09-06 13:55 ` [RFC net-next 2/2] net/smc: remove locks smc_client_lgr_pending and smc_server_lgr_pending D. Wythe
2023-09-08 9:07 ` [RFC net-next 0/2] Optimize the parallelism of SMC-R connections Alexandra Winter
[not found] ` <522d823c-b656-ffb5-bcce-65b96bdfa46d@linux.alibaba.com>
2023-09-21 12:36 ` Alexandra Winter
2023-09-25 10:10 ` D. Wythe
2023-09-26 7:37 ` Alexandra Winter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1694008530-85087-2-git-send-email-alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jaka@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kgraul@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wenjia@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).