netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
To: kgraul@linux.ibm.com, wenjia@linux.ibm.com, jaka@linux.ibm.com,
	wintera@linux.ibm.com
Cc: kuba@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
	"D. Wythe" <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: [PATCH net 1/5] net/smc: fix dangling sock under state SMC_APPFINCLOSEWAIT
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 15:33:16 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1697009600-22367-2-git-send-email-alibuda@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1697009600-22367-1-git-send-email-alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>

From: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>

Considering scenario:

				smc_cdc_rx_handler_rwwi
__smc_release
				sock_set_flag
smc_close_active()
sock_set_flag

__set_bit(DEAD)			__set_bit(DONE)

Dues to __set_bit is not atomic, the DEAD or DONE might be lost.
if the DEAD flag lost, the state SMC_CLOSED  will be never be reached
in smc_close_passive_work:

if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD) &&
	smc_close_sent_any_close(conn)) {
	sk->sk_state = SMC_CLOSED;
} else {
	/* just shutdown, but not yet closed locally */
	sk->sk_state = SMC_APPFINCLOSEWAIT;
}

Replace sock_set_flags or __set_bit to set_bit will fix this problem.
Since set_bit is atomic.

Signed-off-by: D. Wythe <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
---
 net/smc/af_smc.c    | 4 ++--
 net/smc/smc.h       | 5 +++++
 net/smc/smc_cdc.c   | 2 +-
 net/smc/smc_close.c | 2 +-
 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c
index bacdd97..5ad2a9f 100644
--- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
+++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
@@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ static int __smc_release(struct smc_sock *smc)
 
 	if (!smc->use_fallback) {
 		rc = smc_close_active(smc);
-		sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD);
+		smc_sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD);
 		sk->sk_shutdown |= SHUTDOWN_MASK;
 	} else {
 		if (sk->sk_state != SMC_CLOSED) {
@@ -1742,7 +1742,7 @@ static int smc_clcsock_accept(struct smc_sock *lsmc, struct smc_sock **new_smc)
 		if (new_clcsock)
 			sock_release(new_clcsock);
 		new_sk->sk_state = SMC_CLOSED;
-		sock_set_flag(new_sk, SOCK_DEAD);
+		smc_sock_set_flag(new_sk, SOCK_DEAD);
 		sock_put(new_sk); /* final */
 		*new_smc = NULL;
 		goto out;
diff --git a/net/smc/smc.h b/net/smc/smc.h
index 24745fd..e377980 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc.h
+++ b/net/smc/smc.h
@@ -377,4 +377,9 @@ void smc_fill_gid_list(struct smc_link_group *lgr,
 int smc_nl_enable_hs_limitation(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info);
 int smc_nl_disable_hs_limitation(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info);
 
+static inline void smc_sock_set_flag(struct sock *sk, enum sock_flags flag)
+{
+	set_bit(flag, &sk->sk_flags);
+}
+
 #endif	/* __SMC_H */
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_cdc.c b/net/smc/smc_cdc.c
index 89105e9..01bdb79 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_cdc.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_cdc.c
@@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ static void smc_cdc_msg_recv_action(struct smc_sock *smc,
 		smc->sk.sk_shutdown |= RCV_SHUTDOWN;
 		if (smc->clcsock && smc->clcsock->sk)
 			smc->clcsock->sk->sk_shutdown |= RCV_SHUTDOWN;
-		sock_set_flag(&smc->sk, SOCK_DONE);
+		smc_sock_set_flag(&smc->sk, SOCK_DONE);
 		sock_hold(&smc->sk); /* sock_put in close_work */
 		if (!queue_work(smc_close_wq, &conn->close_work))
 			sock_put(&smc->sk);
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_close.c b/net/smc/smc_close.c
index dbdf03e..449ef45 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_close.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_close.c
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ void smc_close_active_abort(struct smc_sock *smc)
 		break;
 	}
 
-	sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD);
+	smc_sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD);
 	sk->sk_state_change(sk);
 
 	if (release_clcsock) {
-- 
1.8.3.1


  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-11  7:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-11  7:33 [PATCH net 0/5] net/smc: bugfixs for smc-r D. Wythe
2023-10-11  7:33 ` D. Wythe [this message]
2023-10-11 14:00   ` [PATCH net 1/5] net/smc: fix dangling sock under state SMC_APPFINCLOSEWAIT Dust Li
2023-10-11 20:31   ` Wenjia Zhang
2023-10-12  2:47     ` D. Wythe
     [not found]     ` <f8089b26-bb11-f82d-8070-222b1f8c1db1@linux.alibaba.com>
2023-10-12 11:51       ` Wenjia Zhang
2023-10-13  5:32         ` Dust Li
2023-10-13 11:52           ` Wenjia Zhang
2023-10-13 12:27             ` Dust Li
2023-10-17  2:00               ` D. Wythe
2023-10-17  8:39                 ` Dust Li
2023-10-17 17:03                 ` Wenjia Zhang
     [not found]                   ` <4065e94f-f7ea-7943-e2cc-0c7d3f9c788b@linux.alibaba.com>
2023-10-19 11:54                     ` Wenjia Zhang
2023-10-23 20:53   ` Wenjia Zhang
2023-10-11  7:33 ` [PATCH net 2/5] net/smc: fix incorrect barrier usage D. Wythe
2023-10-11  8:44   ` Heiko Carstens
2023-10-11  8:57     ` D. Wythe
2023-10-11  7:33 ` [PATCH net 3/5] net/smc: allow cdc msg send rather than drop it with NULL sndbuf_desc D. Wythe
2023-10-11 20:37   ` Wenjia Zhang
2023-10-12  2:49     ` D. Wythe
2023-10-12 15:15       ` Wenjia Zhang
2023-10-11  7:33 ` [PATCH net 4/5] net/smc: protect connection state transitions in listen work D. Wythe
2023-10-12 17:14   ` Wenjia Zhang
2023-10-31  3:04     ` D. Wythe
2023-10-11  7:33 ` [PATCH net 5/5] net/smc: put sk reference if close work was canceled D. Wythe
2023-10-11 14:54   ` Dust Li
2023-10-12 19:04   ` Wenjia Zhang
     [not found]     ` <ee641ca5-104b-d1ec-5b2a-e20237c5378a@linux.alibaba.com>
2023-10-18 20:26       ` Wenjia Zhang
2023-10-19  7:33         ` D. Wythe
2023-10-19 17:40           ` Wenjia Zhang
2023-10-20  2:41             ` D. Wythe
2023-10-23  8:19               ` Wenjia Zhang
2023-10-23  8:52                 ` D. Wythe
2023-10-23 10:28                   ` Wenjia Zhang
2023-10-23 11:56                     ` Dust Li
     [not found]                     ` <59c0c75f-e9df-2ef1-ead2-7c5c97f3e750@linux.alibaba.com>
2023-10-23 20:52                       ` Wenjia Zhang
2023-10-12 13:43 ` [PATCH net 0/5] net/smc: bugfixs for smc-r Alexandra Winter
2023-10-17  1:56   ` D. Wythe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1697009600-22367-2-git-send-email-alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jaka@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kgraul@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wenjia@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=wintera@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).