netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: kuba@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
	pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, dsahern@kernel.org,
	kuniyu@amazon.com, wuyun.abel@bytedance.com, leitao@debian.org,
	alexander@mihalicyn.com, dhowells@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] sock: Use unsafe_memcpy() for sock_copy()
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2024 03:10:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <170969462846.24513.2351243182107643239.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240304212928.make.772-kees@kernel.org>

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:

On Mon,  4 Mar 2024 13:29:31 -0800 you wrote:
> While testing for places where zero-sized destinations were still showing
> up in the kernel, sock_copy() and inet_reqsk_clone() were found, which
> are using very specific memcpy() offsets for both avoiding a portion of
> struct sock, and copying beyond the end of it (since struct sock is really
> just a common header before the protocol-specific allocation). Instead
> of trying to unravel this historical lack of container_of(), just switch
> to unsafe_memcpy(), since that's effectively what was happening already
> (memcpy() wasn't checking 0-sized destinations while the code base was
> being converted away from fake flexible arrays).
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [v3] sock: Use unsafe_memcpy() for sock_copy()
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/ff73f8344e58

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-03-06  3:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-04 21:29 [PATCH v3] sock: Use unsafe_memcpy() for sock_copy() Kees Cook
2024-03-05 13:23 ` Simon Horman
2024-03-06  3:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=170969462846.24513.2351243182107643239.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
    --to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander@mihalicyn.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuniyu@amazon.com \
    --cc=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=wuyun.abel@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).