From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Mike Snitzer" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] bonding: eliminate RTNL assertion spew Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 14:36:27 -0400 Message-ID: <170fa0d20708151136q1535672dvbc90271afe80ec6f@mail.gmail.com> References: <20070109225900.GA11755@gospo.rdu.redhat.com> <20070109150935.6ec3ce69@localhost> <20070110193355.GA13249@gospo.rdu.redhat.com> <170fa0d20708142014l217b8804g66426a84547ba91d@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Stephen Hemminger" , "Jeff Garzik" , fubar@us.ibm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: "Andy Gospodarek" Return-path: Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.177]:2296 "EHLO py-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750727AbXHOSg3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Aug 2007 14:36:29 -0400 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u77so16631pyb for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 11:36:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org I'd very much like to help out. The "rtnl assertion spew" isn't instilling confidence in customers I've been working with. If you'd like to send me patches in private I'd help test them ASAP. Could you elaborate on the associated risk of _not_ fixing these issues? balance-alb _seems_ to be working even though these traces occur on initialization. But these rtnl traces are clearly more generic than balance-alb. regards, Mike On 8/14/07, Andy Gospodarek wrote: > On 8/14/07, Mike Snitzer wrote: > > Andy, > > > > Is there an updated version of this patch? > > > > Please advise, thanks. > > > > > > Mike, > > There is a version that Jay and I have been testing and if you would > like to help out, we could probably send you some patches. > > Jay has split the entire patch into smaller chunks, and we hope to > post the entire thing quite soon (days not months). > > -andy >