netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH net-next v2] net/sched: fix false lockdep warning on qdisc root lock
@ 2024-04-18 13:50 Davide Caratti
  2024-04-18 14:01 ` Davide Caratti
  2024-04-26  9:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Davide Caratti @ 2024-04-18 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Eric Dumazet, Jamal Hadi Salim, Maxim Mikityanskiy,
	Victor Nogueira
  Cc: netdev, renmingshuai, jiri, xiyou.wangcong, xmu, Christoph Paasch

Xiumei and Christoph reported the following lockdep splat, complaining of
the qdisc root lock being taken twice:

 ============================================
 WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
 6.7.0-rc3+ #598 Not tainted
 --------------------------------------------
 swapper/2/0 is trying to acquire lock:
 ffff888177190110 (&sch->q.lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x1560/0x2e70

 but task is already holding lock:
 ffff88811995a110 (&sch->q.lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x1560/0x2e70

 other info that might help us debug this:
  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

        CPU0
        ----
   lock(&sch->q.lock);
   lock(&sch->q.lock);

  *** DEADLOCK ***

  May be due to missing lock nesting notation

 5 locks held by swapper/2/0:
  #0: ffff888135a09d98 ((&in_dev->mr_ifc_timer)){+.-.}-{0:0}, at: call_timer_fn+0x11a/0x510
  #1: ffffffffaaee5260 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: ip_finish_output2+0x2c0/0x1ed0
  #2: ffffffffaaee5200 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x209/0x2e70
  #3: ffff88811995a110 (&sch->q.lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x1560/0x2e70
  #4: ffffffffaaee5200 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x209/0x2e70

 stack backtrace:
 CPU: 2 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/2 Not tainted 6.7.0-rc3+ #598
 Hardware name: Red Hat KVM, BIOS 1.13.0-2.module+el8.3.0+7353+9de0a3cc 04/01/2014
 Call Trace:
  <IRQ>
  dump_stack_lvl+0x4a/0x80
  __lock_acquire+0xfdd/0x3150
  lock_acquire+0x1ca/0x540
  _raw_spin_lock+0x34/0x80
  __dev_queue_xmit+0x1560/0x2e70
  tcf_mirred_act+0x82e/0x1260 [act_mirred]
  tcf_action_exec+0x161/0x480
  tcf_classify+0x689/0x1170
  prio_enqueue+0x316/0x660 [sch_prio]
  dev_qdisc_enqueue+0x46/0x220
  __dev_queue_xmit+0x1615/0x2e70
  ip_finish_output2+0x1218/0x1ed0
  __ip_finish_output+0x8b3/0x1350
  ip_output+0x163/0x4e0
  igmp_ifc_timer_expire+0x44b/0x930
  call_timer_fn+0x1a2/0x510
  run_timer_softirq+0x54d/0x11a0
  __do_softirq+0x1b3/0x88f
  irq_exit_rcu+0x18f/0x1e0
  sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6f/0x90
  </IRQ>

This happens when TC does a mirred egress redirect from the root qdisc of
device A to the root qdisc of device B. As long as these two locks aren't
protecting the same qdisc, they can be acquired in chain: add a per-qdisc
lockdep key to silence false warnings.
This dynamic key should safely replace the static key we have in sch_htb:
it was added to allow enqueueing to the device "direct qdisc" while still
holding the qdisc root lock.

v2: don't use static keys anymore in HTB direct qdiscs (thanks Eric Dumazet)

CC: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maxim@isovalent.com>
CC: Xiumei Mu <xmu@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Christoph Paasch <cpaasch@apple.com>
Closes: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/issues/451
Signed-off-by: Davide Caratti <dcaratti@redhat.com>
---
 include/net/sch_generic.h |  1 +
 net/sched/sch_generic.c   |  3 +++
 net/sched/sch_htb.c       | 22 +++-------------------
 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/sch_generic.h b/include/net/sch_generic.h
index 76db6be16083..47ccaa0bff29 100644
--- a/include/net/sch_generic.h
+++ b/include/net/sch_generic.h
@@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ struct Qdisc {
 
 	struct rcu_head		rcu;
 	netdevice_tracker	dev_tracker;
+	struct lock_class_key	root_lock_key;
 	/* private data */
 	long privdata[] ____cacheline_aligned;
 };
diff --git a/net/sched/sch_generic.c b/net/sched/sch_generic.c
index ff5336493777..7dca99a4e5d1 100644
--- a/net/sched/sch_generic.c
+++ b/net/sched/sch_generic.c
@@ -945,7 +945,9 @@ struct Qdisc *qdisc_alloc(struct netdev_queue *dev_queue,
 	__skb_queue_head_init(&sch->gso_skb);
 	__skb_queue_head_init(&sch->skb_bad_txq);
 	gnet_stats_basic_sync_init(&sch->bstats);
+	lockdep_register_key(&sch->root_lock_key);
 	spin_lock_init(&sch->q.lock);
+	lockdep_set_class(&sch->q.lock, &sch->root_lock_key);
 
 	if (ops->static_flags & TCQ_F_CPUSTATS) {
 		sch->cpu_bstats =
@@ -1067,6 +1069,7 @@ static void __qdisc_destroy(struct Qdisc *qdisc)
 	if (ops->destroy)
 		ops->destroy(qdisc);
 
+	lockdep_unregister_key(&qdisc->root_lock_key);
 	module_put(ops->owner);
 	netdev_put(dev, &qdisc->dev_tracker);
 
diff --git a/net/sched/sch_htb.c b/net/sched/sch_htb.c
index 93e6fb56f3b5..ff3de37874e4 100644
--- a/net/sched/sch_htb.c
+++ b/net/sched/sch_htb.c
@@ -1039,13 +1039,6 @@ static void htb_work_func(struct work_struct *work)
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 
-static void htb_set_lockdep_class_child(struct Qdisc *q)
-{
-	static struct lock_class_key child_key;
-
-	lockdep_set_class(qdisc_lock(q), &child_key);
-}
-
 static int htb_offload(struct net_device *dev, struct tc_htb_qopt_offload *opt)
 {
 	return dev->netdev_ops->ndo_setup_tc(dev, TC_SETUP_QDISC_HTB, opt);
@@ -1132,7 +1125,6 @@ static int htb_init(struct Qdisc *sch, struct nlattr *opt,
 			return -ENOMEM;
 		}
 
-		htb_set_lockdep_class_child(qdisc);
 		q->direct_qdiscs[ntx] = qdisc;
 		qdisc->flags |= TCQ_F_ONETXQUEUE | TCQ_F_NOPARENT;
 	}
@@ -1468,7 +1460,6 @@ static int htb_graft(struct Qdisc *sch, unsigned long arg, struct Qdisc *new,
 	}
 
 	if (q->offload) {
-		htb_set_lockdep_class_child(new);
 		/* One ref for cl->leaf.q, the other for dev_queue->qdisc. */
 		qdisc_refcount_inc(new);
 		old_q = htb_graft_helper(dev_queue, new);
@@ -1733,11 +1724,8 @@ static int htb_delete(struct Qdisc *sch, unsigned long arg,
 		new_q = qdisc_create_dflt(dev_queue, &pfifo_qdisc_ops,
 					  cl->parent->common.classid,
 					  NULL);
-		if (q->offload) {
-			if (new_q)
-				htb_set_lockdep_class_child(new_q);
+		if (q->offload)
 			htb_parent_to_leaf_offload(sch, dev_queue, new_q);
-		}
 	}
 
 	sch_tree_lock(sch);
@@ -1947,13 +1935,9 @@ static int htb_change_class(struct Qdisc *sch, u32 classid,
 		new_q = qdisc_create_dflt(dev_queue, &pfifo_qdisc_ops,
 					  classid, NULL);
 		if (q->offload) {
-			if (new_q) {
-				htb_set_lockdep_class_child(new_q);
-				/* One ref for cl->leaf.q, the other for
-				 * dev_queue->qdisc.
-				 */
+			/* One ref for cl->leaf.q, the other for dev_queue->qdisc. */
+			if (new_q)
 				qdisc_refcount_inc(new_q);
-			}
 			old_q = htb_graft_helper(dev_queue, new_q);
 			/* No qdisc_put needed. */
 			WARN_ON(!(old_q->flags & TCQ_F_BUILTIN));
-- 
2.44.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net/sched: fix false lockdep warning on qdisc root lock
  2024-04-18 13:50 [PATCH net-next v2] net/sched: fix false lockdep warning on qdisc root lock Davide Caratti
@ 2024-04-18 14:01 ` Davide Caratti
  2024-04-23  9:21   ` Paolo Abeni
  2024-04-26  9:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Davide Caratti @ 2024-04-18 14:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Eric Dumazet, Jamal Hadi Salim, Maxim Mikityanskiy,
	Victor Nogueira
  Cc: netdev, renmingshuai, jiri, xiyou.wangcong, xmu, Christoph Paasch

hello,

On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 3:50 PM Davide Caratti <dcaratti@redhat.com> wrote:
>

[...]

> This happens when TC does a mirred egress redirect from the root qdisc of
> device A to the root qdisc of device B. As long as these two locks aren't
> protecting the same qdisc, they can be acquired in chain: add a per-qdisc
> lockdep key to silence false warnings.
> This dynamic key should safely replace the static key we have in sch_htb:
> it was added to allow enqueueing to the device "direct qdisc" while still
> holding the qdisc root lock.
>
> v2: don't use static keys anymore in HTB direct qdiscs (thanks Eric Dumazet)

I didn't have the correct setup to test HTB offload, so any feedback
for the HTB part is appreciated. On a debug kernel the extra time
taken to register / de-register dynamic lockdep keys is very evident
(more when qdisc are created: the time needed for "tc qdisc add ..."
becomes an order of magnitude bigger, while the time for "tc qdisc del
..." doubles).

-- 
davide


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net/sched: fix false lockdep warning on qdisc root lock
  2024-04-18 14:01 ` Davide Caratti
@ 2024-04-23  9:21   ` Paolo Abeni
  2024-04-23  9:40     ` Eric Dumazet
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Abeni @ 2024-04-23  9:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Davide Caratti, Eric Dumazet, Saeed Mahameed, Tariq Toukan
  Cc: netdev, renmingshuai, jiri, xiyou.wangcong, xmu, Christoph Paasch,
	Jamal Hadi Salim, Maxim Mikityanskiy, Victor Nogueira

On Thu, 2024-04-18 at 16:01 +0200, Davide Caratti wrote:
> hello,
> 
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 3:50 PM Davide Caratti <dcaratti@redhat.com> wrote:
> > 
> 
> [...]
> 
> > This happens when TC does a mirred egress redirect from the root qdisc of
> > device A to the root qdisc of device B. As long as these two locks aren't
> > protecting the same qdisc, they can be acquired in chain: add a per-qdisc
> > lockdep key to silence false warnings.
> > This dynamic key should safely replace the static key we have in sch_htb:
> > it was added to allow enqueueing to the device "direct qdisc" while still
> > holding the qdisc root lock.
> > 
> > v2: don't use static keys anymore in HTB direct qdiscs (thanks Eric Dumazet)
> 
> I didn't have the correct setup to test HTB offload, so any feedback
> for the HTB part is appreciated. On a debug kernel the extra time
> taken to register / de-register dynamic lockdep keys is very evident
> (more when qdisc are created: the time needed for "tc qdisc add ..."
> becomes an order of magnitude bigger, while the time for "tc qdisc del
> ..." doubles).

@Eric: why do you think the lockdep slowdown would be critical? We
don't expect to see lockdep in production, right? 

Enabling lockdep will defeat most/all cacheline optimization moving
around all fields after a lock, performances should be significantly
impacted anyway.

WDYT?

The HTB bits looks safe to me, but it would be great if someone @nvidia
could actually test it (AFAICS mlx5 is the only user of such
annotation).

Thanks!

Paolo


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net/sched: fix false lockdep warning on qdisc root lock
  2024-04-23  9:21   ` Paolo Abeni
@ 2024-04-23  9:40     ` Eric Dumazet
  2024-04-23  9:54       ` Paolo Abeni
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Eric Dumazet @ 2024-04-23  9:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paolo Abeni
  Cc: Davide Caratti, Saeed Mahameed, Tariq Toukan, netdev,
	renmingshuai, jiri, xiyou.wangcong, xmu, Christoph Paasch,
	Jamal Hadi Salim, Maxim Mikityanskiy, Victor Nogueira

On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 11:21 AM Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2024-04-18 at 16:01 +0200, Davide Caratti wrote:
> > hello,
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 3:50 PM Davide Caratti <dcaratti@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > This happens when TC does a mirred egress redirect from the root qdisc of
> > > device A to the root qdisc of device B. As long as these two locks aren't
> > > protecting the same qdisc, they can be acquired in chain: add a per-qdisc
> > > lockdep key to silence false warnings.
> > > This dynamic key should safely replace the static key we have in sch_htb:
> > > it was added to allow enqueueing to the device "direct qdisc" while still
> > > holding the qdisc root lock.
> > >
> > > v2: don't use static keys anymore in HTB direct qdiscs (thanks Eric Dumazet)
> >
> > I didn't have the correct setup to test HTB offload, so any feedback
> > for the HTB part is appreciated. On a debug kernel the extra time
> > taken to register / de-register dynamic lockdep keys is very evident
> > (more when qdisc are created: the time needed for "tc qdisc add ..."
> > becomes an order of magnitude bigger, while the time for "tc qdisc del
> > ..." doubles).
>
> @Eric: why do you think the lockdep slowdown would be critical? We
> don't expect to see lockdep in production, right?

I think you missed one of my update, where I said this was absolutely ok.

https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CANn89iJQZ5R=Cct494W0DbNXR3pxOj54zDY7bgtFFCiiC1abDg@mail.gmail.com/



>
> Enabling lockdep will defeat most/all cacheline optimization moving
> around all fields after a lock, performances should be significantly
> impacted anyway.
>
> WDYT?
>
> The HTB bits looks safe to me, but it would be great if someone @nvidia
> could actually test it (AFAICS mlx5 is the only user of such
> annotation).
>
> Thanks!
>
> Paolo
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net/sched: fix false lockdep warning on qdisc root lock
  2024-04-23  9:40     ` Eric Dumazet
@ 2024-04-23  9:54       ` Paolo Abeni
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Abeni @ 2024-04-23  9:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Eric Dumazet
  Cc: Davide Caratti, Saeed Mahameed, Tariq Toukan, netdev,
	renmingshuai, jiri, xiyou.wangcong, xmu, Christoph Paasch,
	Jamal Hadi Salim, Maxim Mikityanskiy, Victor Nogueira

On Tue, 2024-04-23 at 11:40 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 11:21 AM Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, 2024-04-18 at 16:01 +0200, Davide Caratti wrote:
> > > hello,
> > > 
> > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 3:50 PM Davide Caratti <dcaratti@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > [...]
> > > 
> > > > This happens when TC does a mirred egress redirect from the root qdisc of
> > > > device A to the root qdisc of device B. As long as these two locks aren't
> > > > protecting the same qdisc, they can be acquired in chain: add a per-qdisc
> > > > lockdep key to silence false warnings.
> > > > This dynamic key should safely replace the static key we have in sch_htb:
> > > > it was added to allow enqueueing to the device "direct qdisc" while still
> > > > holding the qdisc root lock.
> > > > 
> > > > v2: don't use static keys anymore in HTB direct qdiscs (thanks Eric Dumazet)
> > > 
> > > I didn't have the correct setup to test HTB offload, so any feedback
> > > for the HTB part is appreciated. On a debug kernel the extra time
> > > taken to register / de-register dynamic lockdep keys is very evident
> > > (more when qdisc are created: the time needed for "tc qdisc add ..."
> > > becomes an order of magnitude bigger, while the time for "tc qdisc del
> > > ..." doubles).
> > 
> > @Eric: why do you think the lockdep slowdown would be critical? We
> > don't expect to see lockdep in production, right?
> 
> I think you missed one of my update, where I said this was absolutely ok.
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CANn89iJQZ5R=Cct494W0DbNXR3pxOj54zDY7bgtFFCiiC1abDg@mail.gmail.com/

Indeed I missed that, thanks for pointing out.

> > Enabling lockdep will defeat most/all cacheline optimization moving
> > around all fields after a lock, performances should be significantly
> > impacted anyway.
> > 
> > WDYT?
> > 
> > The HTB bits looks safe to me, but it would be great if someone @nvidia
> > could actually test it (AFAICS mlx5 is the only user of such
> > annotation).

Let's wait a bit for some feedback here.

Thanks,

Paolo


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net/sched: fix false lockdep warning on qdisc root lock
  2024-04-18 13:50 [PATCH net-next v2] net/sched: fix false lockdep warning on qdisc root lock Davide Caratti
  2024-04-18 14:01 ` Davide Caratti
@ 2024-04-26  9:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2024-04-26  9:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Davide Caratti
  Cc: edumazet, jhs, maxim, victor, netdev, renmingshuai, jiri,
	xiyou.wangcong, xmu, cpaasch

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>:

On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 15:50:11 +0200 you wrote:
> Xiumei and Christoph reported the following lockdep splat, complaining of
> the qdisc root lock being taken twice:
> 
>  ============================================
>  WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
>  6.7.0-rc3+ #598 Not tainted
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net-next,v2] net/sched: fix false lockdep warning on qdisc root lock
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/af0cb3fa3f9e

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-04-26  9:30 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-04-18 13:50 [PATCH net-next v2] net/sched: fix false lockdep warning on qdisc root lock Davide Caratti
2024-04-18 14:01 ` Davide Caratti
2024-04-23  9:21   ` Paolo Abeni
2024-04-23  9:40     ` Eric Dumazet
2024-04-23  9:54       ` Paolo Abeni
2024-04-26  9:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).