Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com>
To: <johannes@sipsolutions.net>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
	<edumazet@google.com>, <kuba@kernel.org>, <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	<emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Cc: <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/2] net: rfkill: Fix a wrongly handling error case
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 22:40:11 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1717771212-30723-2-git-send-email-quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1717771212-30723-1-git-send-email-quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com>

Kernel API rfkill_set_hw_state_reason() does not return current combined
block state when its parameter @reason is invalid, that is wrong according
to its comments.

Fixed by returning API required value, also use pr_err() instead of WARN()
for this error case handling.

Fixes: 14486c82612a ("rfkill: add a reason to the HW rfkill state")
Signed-off-by: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com>
---
 net/rfkill/core.c | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/rfkill/core.c b/net/rfkill/core.c
index c3feb4f49d09..0dc982b4fce6 100644
--- a/net/rfkill/core.c
+++ b/net/rfkill/core.c
@@ -543,13 +543,15 @@ bool rfkill_set_hw_state_reason(struct rfkill *rfkill,
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 	bool ret, prev;
+	const unsigned long reason_mask = RFKILL_HARD_BLOCK_SIGNAL |
+		RFKILL_HARD_BLOCK_NOT_OWNER;
 
 	BUG_ON(!rfkill);
 
-	if (WARN(reason &
-	    ~(RFKILL_HARD_BLOCK_SIGNAL | RFKILL_HARD_BLOCK_NOT_OWNER),
-	    "hw_state reason not supported: 0x%lx", reason))
-		return blocked;
+	if (reason & ~reason_mask) {
+		pr_err("hw_state reason not supported: 0x%lx\n", reason);
+		return rfkill_blocked(rfkill);
+	}
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&rfkill->lock, flags);
 	prev = !!(rfkill->hard_block_reasons & reason);
-- 
2.7.4


  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-07 14:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-07 14:40 [PATCH v1 0/2] net: rfkill: Fix 2 bugs within rfkill_set_hw_state_reason() Zijun Hu
2024-06-07 14:40 ` Zijun Hu [this message]
2024-06-12  8:15   ` [PATCH v1 1/2] net: rfkill: Fix a wrongly handling error case Johannes Berg
2024-06-12 10:12     ` quic_zijuhu
2024-06-12 10:14       ` Johannes Berg
2024-06-07 14:40 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] net: rfkill: Fix a logic error within rfkill_set_hw_state_reason() Zijun Hu
2024-06-12  8:18   ` Johannes Berg
2024-06-12  9:43     ` quic_zijuhu
2024-06-12 10:10       ` Johannes Berg
2024-06-12 10:11       ` Johannes Berg
2024-06-12 10:18   ` Johannes Berg
2024-06-12 10:35     ` quic_zijuhu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1717771212-30723-2-git-send-email-quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com \
    --to=quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox