From: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <hawk@kernel.org>,
"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 08/10] virtio_net: xsk: rx: support recv small mode
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 13:44:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1719553452.932589-3-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACGkMEuPB=We-pnj8QH9Oiv4F=XHTcrRsHVVmOnUn9H7+Nrihw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 28 Jun 2024 10:19:41 +0800, Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 3:57 PM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> >
> > In the process:
> > 1. We may need to copy data to create skb for XDP_PASS.
> > 2. We may need to call xsk_buff_free() to release the buffer.
> > 3. The handle for xdp_buff is difference from the buffer.
> >
> > If we pushed this logic into existing receive handle(merge and small),
> > we would have to maintain code scattered inside merge and small (and big).
> > So I think it is a good choice for us to put the xsk code into an
> > independent function.
>
> I think it's better to try to reuse the existing functions.
>
> More below:
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 135 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 133 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > index 2ac5668a94ce..06608d696e2e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > @@ -500,6 +500,10 @@ struct virtio_net_common_hdr {
> > };
> >
> > static void virtnet_sq_free_unused_buf(struct virtqueue *vq, void *buf);
> > +static int virtnet_xdp_handler(struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog, struct xdp_buff *xdp,
> > + struct net_device *dev,
> > + unsigned int *xdp_xmit,
> > + struct virtnet_rq_stats *stats);
> >
> > static bool is_xdp_frame(void *ptr)
> > {
> > @@ -1040,6 +1044,120 @@ static void sg_fill_dma(struct scatterlist *sg, dma_addr_t addr, u32 len)
> > sg->length = len;
> > }
> >
> > +static struct xdp_buff *buf_to_xdp(struct virtnet_info *vi,
> > + struct receive_queue *rq, void *buf, u32 len)
> > +{
> > + struct xdp_buff *xdp;
> > + u32 bufsize;
> > +
> > + xdp = (struct xdp_buff *)buf;
> > +
> > + bufsize = xsk_pool_get_rx_frame_size(rq->xsk.pool) + vi->hdr_len;
> > +
> > + if (unlikely(len > bufsize)) {
> > + pr_debug("%s: rx error: len %u exceeds truesize %u\n",
> > + vi->dev->name, len, bufsize);
> > + DEV_STATS_INC(vi->dev, rx_length_errors);
> > + xsk_buff_free(xdp);
> > + return NULL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + xsk_buff_set_size(xdp, len);
> > + xsk_buff_dma_sync_for_cpu(xdp);
> > +
> > + return xdp;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct sk_buff *xdp_construct_skb(struct receive_queue *rq,
> > + struct xdp_buff *xdp)
> > +{
>
> So we have a similar caller which is receive_small_build_skb(). Any
> chance to reuse that?
receive_small_build_skb works with build_skb.
Here we need to copy the packet from the xsk buffer to the skb buffer.
So I do not think we can reuse it.
>
> > + unsigned int metasize = xdp->data - xdp->data_meta;
> > + struct sk_buff *skb;
> > + unsigned int size;
> > +
> > + size = xdp->data_end - xdp->data_hard_start;
> > + skb = napi_alloc_skb(&rq->napi, size);
> > + if (unlikely(!skb)) {
> > + xsk_buff_free(xdp);
> > + return NULL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + skb_reserve(skb, xdp->data_meta - xdp->data_hard_start);
> > +
> > + size = xdp->data_end - xdp->data_meta;
> > + memcpy(__skb_put(skb, size), xdp->data_meta, size);
> > +
> > + if (metasize) {
> > + __skb_pull(skb, metasize);
> > + skb_metadata_set(skb, metasize);
> > + }
> > +
> > + xsk_buff_free(xdp);
> > +
> > + return skb;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct sk_buff *virtnet_receive_xsk_small(struct net_device *dev, struct virtnet_info *vi,
> > + struct receive_queue *rq, struct xdp_buff *xdp,
> > + unsigned int *xdp_xmit,
> > + struct virtnet_rq_stats *stats)
> > +{
> > + struct bpf_prog *prog;
> > + u32 ret;
> > +
> > + ret = XDP_PASS;
> > + rcu_read_lock();
> > + prog = rcu_dereference(rq->xdp_prog);
> > + if (prog)
> > + ret = virtnet_xdp_handler(prog, xdp, dev, xdp_xmit, stats);
> > + rcu_read_unlock();
> > +
> > + switch (ret) {
> > + case XDP_PASS:
> > + return xdp_construct_skb(rq, xdp);
> > +
> > + case XDP_TX:
> > + case XDP_REDIRECT:
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + default:
> > + /* drop packet */
> > + xsk_buff_free(xdp);
> > + u64_stats_inc(&stats->drops);
> > + return NULL;
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct sk_buff *virtnet_receive_xsk_buf(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq,
> > + void *buf, u32 len,
> > + unsigned int *xdp_xmit,
> > + struct virtnet_rq_stats *stats)
> > +{
> > + struct net_device *dev = vi->dev;
> > + struct sk_buff *skb = NULL;
> > + struct xdp_buff *xdp;
> > +
> > + len -= vi->hdr_len;
> > +
> > + u64_stats_add(&stats->bytes, len);
> > +
> > + xdp = buf_to_xdp(vi, rq, buf, len);
> > + if (!xdp)
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + if (unlikely(len < ETH_HLEN)) {
> > + pr_debug("%s: short packet %i\n", dev->name, len);
> > + DEV_STATS_INC(dev, rx_length_errors);
> > + xsk_buff_free(xdp);
> > + return NULL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (!vi->mergeable_rx_bufs)
> > + skb = virtnet_receive_xsk_small(dev, vi, rq, xdp, xdp_xmit, stats);
> > +
> > + return skb;
> > +}
> > +
> > static int virtnet_add_recvbuf_xsk(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq,
> > struct xsk_buff_pool *pool, gfp_t gfp)
> > {
> > @@ -2363,9 +2481,22 @@ static int virtnet_receive(struct receive_queue *rq, int budget,
> > void *buf;
> > int i;
> >
> > - if (!vi->big_packets || vi->mergeable_rx_bufs) {
> > - void *ctx;
> > + if (rq->xsk.pool) {
> > + struct sk_buff *skb;
> > +
> > + while (packets < budget) {
> > + buf = virtqueue_get_buf(rq->vq, &len);
> > + if (!buf)
> > + break;
> >
> > + skb = virtnet_receive_xsk_buf(vi, rq, buf, len, xdp_xmit, &stats);
> > + if (skb)
> > + virtnet_receive_done(vi, rq, skb);
> > +
> > + packets++;
> > + }
>
> If reusing turns out to be hard, I'd rather add new paths in receive_small().
The exist function is called after virtnet_rq_get_buf(), that will do dma unmap.
But for xsk, the dma unmap is not need. So xsk receive handle should use
virtqueue_get_buf directly.
Thanks.
>
> > + } else if (!vi->big_packets || vi->mergeable_rx_bufs) {
> > + void *ctx;
> > while (packets < budget &&
> > (buf = virtnet_rq_get_buf(rq, &len, &ctx))) {
> > receive_buf(vi, rq, buf, len, ctx, xdp_xmit, &stats);
> > --
> > 2.32.0.3.g01195cf9f
> >
>
> Thanks
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-28 5:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-18 7:56 [PATCH net-next v6 00/10] virtio-net: support AF_XDP zero copy Xuan Zhuo
2024-06-18 7:56 ` [PATCH net-next v6 01/10] virtio_net: separate virtnet_rx_resize() Xuan Zhuo
2024-06-18 7:56 ` [PATCH net-next v6 02/10] virtio_net: separate virtnet_tx_resize() Xuan Zhuo
2024-06-18 7:56 ` [PATCH net-next v6 03/10] virtio_net: separate receive_buf Xuan Zhuo
2024-06-18 7:56 ` [PATCH net-next v6 04/10] virtio_net: separate receive_mergeable Xuan Zhuo
2024-06-18 7:56 ` [PATCH net-next v6 05/10] virtio_net: xsk: bind/unbind xsk for rx Xuan Zhuo
2024-06-28 2:19 ` Jason Wang
2024-06-28 5:42 ` Xuan Zhuo
2024-06-18 7:56 ` [PATCH net-next v6 06/10] virtio_net: xsk: support wakeup Xuan Zhuo
2024-06-18 7:56 ` [PATCH net-next v6 07/10] virtio_net: xsk: rx: support fill with xsk buffer Xuan Zhuo
2024-06-20 10:20 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-06-20 10:37 ` Xuan Zhuo
2024-06-28 2:19 ` Jason Wang
2024-06-28 5:42 ` Xuan Zhuo
2024-07-01 3:05 ` Jason Wang
2024-07-01 8:34 ` Xuan Zhuo
2024-06-18 7:56 ` [PATCH net-next v6 08/10] virtio_net: xsk: rx: support recv small mode Xuan Zhuo
2024-06-28 2:19 ` Jason Wang
2024-06-28 5:44 ` Xuan Zhuo [this message]
2024-07-01 3:20 ` Jason Wang
2024-07-01 3:25 ` Jason Wang
2024-07-01 8:32 ` Xuan Zhuo
2024-06-18 7:56 ` [PATCH net-next v6 09/10] virtio_net: xsk: rx: support recv merge mode Xuan Zhuo
2024-06-20 10:37 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-06-20 10:57 ` Xuan Zhuo
2024-06-28 2:19 ` Jason Wang
2024-06-28 5:50 ` Xuan Zhuo
2024-06-18 7:56 ` [PATCH net-next v6 10/10] virtio_net: xsk: rx: free the unused xsk buffer Xuan Zhuo
2024-06-20 10:46 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-06-20 10:48 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-06-20 10:54 ` Xuan Zhuo
2024-06-28 2:19 ` Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1719553452.932589-3-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox