From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Russell King (Oracle) <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: andrew@lunn.ch, hkallweit1@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] net: phylink: simplify SFP PHY attachment
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 19:00:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <173022844073.790671.7512388845260359270.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zxj8_clRmDA_G7uH@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Hello:
This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 14:41:17 +0100 you wrote:
> Hi,
>
> These two patches simplify how we attach SFP PHYs.
>
> The first patch notices that at the two sites where we call
> sfp_select_interface(), if that fails, we always print the same error.
> Move this into its own function.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net-next,v2,1/3] net: phylink: add common validation for sfp_select_interface()
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/280ed44982ff
- [net-next,v2,2/3] net: phylink: validate sfp_select_interface() returned interface
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/41caa7e81b97
- [net-next,v2,3/3] net: phylink: simplify how SFP PHYs are attached
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/25391e82ffe2
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-29 19:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-23 13:41 [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] net: phylink: simplify SFP PHY attachment Russell King (Oracle)
2024-10-23 13:41 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] net: phylink: add common validation for sfp_select_interface() Russell King (Oracle)
2024-10-23 13:41 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/3] net: phylink: validate sfp_select_interface() returned interface Russell King (Oracle)
2024-10-23 13:41 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/3] net: phylink: simplify how SFP PHYs are attached Russell King (Oracle)
2024-10-29 19:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=173022844073.790671.7512388845260359270.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).