[PATCH] rocker: fix link status detection in rocker_carrier_init()

[PATCH] rocker: fix link status detection in rocker_carrier_init()

[Dmitry Antipov]

Since '1 << rocker_port->pport' may be undefined for port >= 32,
cast the left operand to 'unsigned long long' like it's done in
'rocker_port_set_enable()' above. Compile tested only.

Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@yandex.ru>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker_main.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker_main.c
index 84fa911c78db..fe0bf1d3217a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker_main.c
@@ -2502,7 +2502,7 @@ static void rocker_carrier_init(const struct rocker_port *rocker_port)
 	u64 link_status = rocker_read64(rocker, PORT_PHYS_LINK_STATUS);
 	bool link_up;
 
-	link_up = link_status & (1 << rocker_port->pport);
+	link_up = link_status & (1ULL << rocker_port->pport);
 	if (link_up)
 		netif_carrier_on(rocker_port->dev);
 	else
-- 
2.47.0

Re: [PATCH] rocker: fix link status detection in rocker_carrier_init()

[Jakub Kicinski]

On Thu, 14 Nov 2024 18:19:46 +0300 Dmitry Antipov wrote:
> Since '1 << rocker_port->pport' may be undefined for port >= 32,
> cast the left operand to 'unsigned long long' like it's done in
> 'rocker_port_set_enable()' above. Compile tested only.

Jiri, random thought - any sense if anyone still uses rocker?
IIUC the goal was similar to netdevsim - SW testing / modeling
but we don't really have any upstream tests against it..

Unrelated to the patch, so dropping the author from CC.

Re: [PATCH] rocker: fix link status detection in rocker_carrier_init()

[Jiri Pirko]

Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 03:42:01AM CET, kuba@kernel.org wrote:
>On Thu, 14 Nov 2024 18:19:46 +0300 Dmitry Antipov wrote:
>> Since '1 << rocker_port->pport' may be undefined for port >= 32,
>> cast the left operand to 'unsigned long long' like it's done in
>> 'rocker_port_set_enable()' above. Compile tested only.
>
>Jiri, random thought - any sense if anyone still uses rocker?
>IIUC the goal was similar to netdevsim - SW testing / modeling
>but we don't really have any upstream tests against it..

Afaik some people are still using it for testing. I got couple emails in
the past. Not sure now. The thing is, rocker has real datapath,
comparing to netdevsim.

>
>Unrelated to the patch, so dropping the author from CC.

Re: [PATCH] rocker: fix link status detection in rocker_carrier_init()

[patchwork-bot+netdevbpf]

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:

On Thu, 14 Nov 2024 18:19:46 +0300 you wrote:
> Since '1 << rocker_port->pport' may be undefined for port >= 32,
> cast the left operand to 'unsigned long long' like it's done in
> 'rocker_port_set_enable()' above. Compile tested only.
> 
> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@yandex.ru>
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - rocker: fix link status detection in rocker_carrier_init()
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/e64285ff41bb

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html