From: Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@canonical.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@nvidia.com>,
Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [TEST] bond_options.sh looks flaky
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 15:25:57 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <17415.1705965957@famine> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240122135524.251b0975@kernel.org>
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote:
>Hi folks,
>
>looks like tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.sh
>is a bit flaky. This error:
>
># TEST: prio (balance-alb arp_ip_target primary_reselect 1) [FAIL]
># Current active slave is eth2 but not eth1
>
>https://netdev-2.bots.linux.dev/vmksft-bonding/results/432442/7-bond-options-sh
>
>was gone on the next run, even tho the only difference between
>the content of the tree was:
>
>$ git diff net-next-2024-01-22--18-00..net-next-2024-01-22--21-00 --stat
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/adi,adin.yaml | 7 ++-----
> drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c | 2 +-
> drivers/net/phy/adin.c | 2 --
> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
>So definitely nothing of relevance..
>
>Any ideas?
I think I see a couple of things in the test logic:
1) in bond_options.sh:
prio_arp()
{
local primary_reselect
local mode=$1
for primary_reselect in 0 1 2; do
prio_test "mode active-backup arp_interval 100 arp_ip_target ${g_ip4} primary eth1 primary_reselect $primary_reselect"
log_test "prio" "$mode arp_ip_target primary_reselect $primary_reselect"
done
}
The above appears to always test with "mode active-backup"
regardless of what $mode contains, but logs that $mode was tested. The
same is true for the prio_ns test that is just after prio_arp in
bond_options.sh.
2) The balance-alb and balance-tlb modes don't work with the ARP
monitor. If the prio_arp or prio_ns tests were actually testing the
stated $mode with arp_interval, it should never succeed.
3) I'm not sure why this test fails, but the prior test that claims to
be active-backup does not, even though both appear to be actually
testing active-backup. The log entries for the actual "prio
(active-backup arp_ip_target primary_reselect 1)" test start at time
281.913374, and differ from the failing test starting at 715.597039.
-J
---
-Jay Vosburgh, jay.vosburgh@canonical.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-22 23:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-22 21:55 [TEST] bond_options.sh looks flaky Jakub Kicinski
2024-01-22 23:25 ` Jay Vosburgh [this message]
2024-01-23 3:56 ` Hangbin Liu
2024-01-23 7:17 ` Hangbin Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=17415.1705965957@famine \
--to=jay.vosburgh@canonical.com \
--cc=bpoirier@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).