From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
pabeni@redhat.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org,
sdf@fomichev.me
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 00/11] net: skip taking rtnl_lock for queue GET
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 17:30:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <174292383401.660431.1912162765020068057.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250324224537.248800-1-kuba@kernel.org>
Hello:
This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
On Mon, 24 Mar 2025 15:45:26 -0700 you wrote:
> Skip taking rtnl_lock for queue GET ops on devices which opt
> into running all ops under the instance lock.
>
> This fixes and completes Stan's ops-locking work, so I think
> for sanity / ease of backporting fixes we should merge it for
> v6.15.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net-next,v2,01/11] net: bubble up taking netdev instance lock to callers of net_devmem_unbind_dmabuf()
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/ba6f418fbf64
- [net-next,v2,02/11] net: remove netif_set_real_num_rx_queues() helper for when SYSFS=n
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/bae2da826196
- [net-next,v2,03/11] net: constify dev pointer in misc instance lock helpers
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/e2f81e8f4d0c
- [net-next,v2,04/11] net: explain "protection types" for the instance lock
(no matching commit)
- [net-next,v2,05/11] net: designate queue counts as "double ops protected" by instance lock
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/0a65dcf6249b
- [net-next,v2,06/11] net: designate queue -> napi linking as "ops protected"
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/310ae9eb2617
- [net-next,v2,07/11] net: protect rxq->mp_params with the instance lock
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/b52458652eca
- [net-next,v2,08/11] net: make NETDEV_UNREGISTER and instance lock more consistent
(no matching commit)
- [net-next,v2,09/11] net: designate XSK pool pointers in queues as "ops protected"
(no matching commit)
- [net-next,v2,10/11] netdev: add "ops compat locking" helpers
(no matching commit)
- [net-next,v2,11/11] netdev: don't hold rtnl_lock over nl queue info get when possible
(no matching commit)
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-25 17:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-24 22:45 [PATCH net-next v2 00/11] net: skip taking rtnl_lock for queue GET Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 01/11] net: bubble up taking netdev instance lock to callers of net_devmem_unbind_dmabuf() Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-25 5:19 ` Mina Almasry
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 02/11] net: remove netif_set_real_num_rx_queues() helper for when SYSFS=n Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 03/11] net: constify dev pointer in misc instance lock helpers Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 04/11] net: explain "protection types" for the instance lock Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 05/11] net: designate queue counts as "double ops protected" by " Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 06/11] net: designate queue -> napi linking as "ops protected" Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 07/11] net: protect rxq->mp_params with the instance lock Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-25 5:34 ` Mina Almasry
2025-03-25 9:50 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 08/11] net: make NETDEV_UNREGISTER and instance lock more consistent Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-25 12:17 ` Cosmin Ratiu
2025-03-25 17:04 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 09/11] net: designate XSK pool pointers in queues as "ops protected" Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 10/11] netdev: add "ops compat locking" helpers Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-24 22:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 11/11] netdev: don't hold rtnl_lock over nl queue info get when possible Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-25 4:04 ` [PATCH net-next v2 00/11] net: skip taking rtnl_lock for queue GET Stanislav Fomichev
2025-03-25 17:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=174292383401.660431.1912162765020068057.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).