* [net-next PATCH v3 0/2] octeontx2-pf: Do not detect MACSEC block based on silicon
@ 2025-05-22 6:15 Subbaraya Sundeep
2025-05-27 10:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Subbaraya Sundeep @ 2025-05-22 6:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: andrew+netdev, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, horms, sd, gakula,
hkelam, sgoutham, lcherian, bbhushan2, jerinj
Cc: netdev, Subbaraya Sundeep
Out of various silicon variants of CN10K series some have hardware
MACSEC block for offloading MACSEC operations and some do not.
AF driver already has the information of whether MACSEC is present
or not on running silicon. Hence fetch that information from
AF via mailbox message.
Changes for v3:
None. Resubmitting as v3 since there is no activity on v2
for a while.
Changes for v2:
Changed subject prefix to net-next
Subbaraya Sundeep (2):
octeontx2-af: Add MACSEC capability flag
octeontx2-pf: macsec: Get MACSEC capability flag from AF
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mbox.h | 2 ++
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu.c | 3 ++
.../ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_common.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++
.../ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_common.h | 4 +--
.../net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_pf.c | 2 ++
5 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [net-next PATCH v3 0/2] octeontx2-pf: Do not detect MACSEC block based on silicon
2025-05-22 6:15 [net-next PATCH v3 0/2] octeontx2-pf: Do not detect MACSEC block based on silicon Subbaraya Sundeep
@ 2025-05-27 10:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2025-05-27 10:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Subbaraya Sundeep
Cc: andrew+netdev, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, horms, sd, gakula,
hkelam, sgoutham, lcherian, bbhushan2, jerinj, netdev
Hello:
This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>:
On Thu, 22 May 2025 11:45:16 +0530 you wrote:
> Out of various silicon variants of CN10K series some have hardware
> MACSEC block for offloading MACSEC operations and some do not.
> AF driver already has the information of whether MACSEC is present
> or not on running silicon. Hence fetch that information from
> AF via mailbox message.
>
> Changes for v3:
> None. Resubmitting as v3 since there is no activity on v2
> for a while.
> Changes for v2:
> Changed subject prefix to net-next
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net-next,v3,1/2] octeontx2-af: Add MACSEC capability flag
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/732038370e55
- [net-next,v3,2/2] octeontx2-pf: macsec: Get MACSEC capability flag from AF
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/5fa6f0245960
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-05-27 9:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-05-22 6:15 [net-next PATCH v3 0/2] octeontx2-pf: Do not detect MACSEC block based on silicon Subbaraya Sundeep
2025-05-27 10:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).