From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFAEA2EE5FE; Wed, 16 Jul 2025 22:09:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752703791; cv=none; b=OSNAOIVcIUh1JWEbevMF7bjhYIJggxg2R/xjVpCmBZ9Bz3hPGxW4lDbrz4xDJfJ0m6r7+v9ybhwTBTHPHSIsU8egVN1NmLWNEntTbYBkU85MAAy7wPRjtQg6A9SCYSxfr3VeurqHjw+RF6IMITE1QxtLwCtfTFUEdD1QxCjqFt0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752703791; c=relaxed/simple; bh=mNFVHEBnhuird5zyEhCc/wBwLPL9kDMSU2Mpwt4O8zQ=; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject:From:Message-Id:Date:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=Dt/smOCvCD0pqG4N7ew90nuGYpFujG3p5hNm6oxPcttyJTguUf5vAvTSS13JyMx+Z+TAa3g4Z85TvTbpc61WHCQADQIUBcwlgxdM9bMNsbl0L6TLgSWpEezkWHpYb04vUe/nVmJVa6W8oThrSar2COrdvyM73+fkbMLnqS5kqsM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=LFDjqxXx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="LFDjqxXx" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 39669C4CEE7; Wed, 16 Jul 2025 22:09:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1752703791; bh=mNFVHEBnhuird5zyEhCc/wBwLPL9kDMSU2Mpwt4O8zQ=; h=Subject:From:Date:References:In-Reply-To:To:Cc:From; b=LFDjqxXxxyL8E6s+/CABfGzDqLNG2T/c14BO45mBISplDEdnSQC3/1vgcOU+SujVb x8Ftmcp46TAVPwZ+masX9gbi8ommh7fQ6aQhiyUwVIldcFNcq/B7z67Gq4hx+mESBt yjQcp8pB1GZIgb2DC2GA3ay4vMa30QXiF3Hyb5kdb09mdHkehpN+Q4PDvLf7fKrYwE RJ80ZrAnghLjxvV4c/Jce/IHuP9Yn3ySzjOD5dfq5xkmFHpeY0NmvPfJ1vhFAKddKk VY8aHTup+2zkJuCy4a6mB7NU/SSNx7w5uHrBzy6g/9j4l44/BD0gQOm0DlKYZN89Ht jYUNpmb95yU4g== Received: from [10.30.226.235] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by aws-us-west-2-korg-oddjob-rhel9-1.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADEBC383BA38; Wed, 16 Jul 2025 22:10:12 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PATCH net] selftests: rtnetlink: fix addrlft test flakiness on power-saving systems From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Message-Id: <175270381125.1341865.1254102075141304386.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 22:10:11 +0000 References: <20250715043459.110523-1-liuhangbin@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20250715043459.110523-1-liuhangbin@gmail.com> To: Hangbin Liu Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Hello: This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main) by Jakub Kicinski : On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 04:34:59 +0000 you wrote: > Jakub reported that the rtnetlink test for the preferred lifetime of an > address has become quite flaky. The issue started appearing around the 6.16 > merge window in May, and the test fails with: > > FAIL: preferred_lft addresses remaining > > The flakiness might be related to power-saving behavior, as address > expiration is handled by a "power-efficient" workqueue. > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [net] selftests: rtnetlink: fix addrlft test flakiness on power-saving systems https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/3047957cc7c1 You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html