netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Qingfang Deng <dqfext@gmail.com>
Cc: ajk@comnets.uni-bremen.de, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
	davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, linux-hams@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	dan.carpenter@linaro.org,
	syzbot+5fd749c74105b0e1b302@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] 6pack: drop redundant locking and refcounting
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2025 08:30:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <175922100999.1892773.7313320613788612084.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250925051059.26876-1-dqfext@gmail.com>

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>:

On Thu, 25 Sep 2025 13:10:59 +0800 you wrote:
> The TTY layer already serializes line discipline operations with
> tty->ldisc_sem, so the extra disc_data_lock and refcnt in 6pack
> are unnecessary.
> 
> Removing them simplifies the code and also resolves a lockdep warning
> reported by syzbot. The warning did not indicate a real deadlock, since
> the write-side lock was only taken in process context with hardirqs
> disabled.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net-next,v2] 6pack: drop redundant locking and refcounting
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/38b04ed7072e

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



      parent reply	other threads:[~2025-09-30  8:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-25  5:10 [PATCH net-next v2] 6pack: drop redundant locking and refcounting Qingfang Deng
2025-09-25  6:11 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-09-30  8:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=175922100999.1892773.7313320613788612084.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
    --to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
    --cc=ajk@comnets.uni-bremen.de \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dqfext@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hams@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=syzbot+5fd749c74105b0e1b302@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).