From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Fernando Fernandez Mancera <fmancera@suse.de>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, dsahern@kernel.org,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
horms@kernel.org, g.djavadyan@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 net-next v2] ipv6: clear RA flags when adding a static route
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 03:30:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <176352302649.209489.15960953294481237254.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251115095939.6967-1-fmancera@suse.de>
Hello:
This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
On Sat, 15 Nov 2025 10:59:38 +0100 you wrote:
> When an IPv6 Router Advertisement (RA) is received for a prefix, the
> kernel creates the corresponding on-link route with flags RTF_ADDRCONF
> and RTF_PREFIX_RT configured and RTF_EXPIRES if lifetime is set.
>
> If later a user configures a static IPv6 address on the same prefix the
> kernel clears the RTF_EXPIRES flag but it doesn't clear the RTF_ADDRCONF
> and RTF_PREFIX_RT. When the next RA for that prefix is received, the
> kernel sees the route as RA-learned and wrongly configures back the
> lifetime. This is problematic because if the route expires, the static
> address won't have the corresponding on-link route.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [1/2,net-next,v2] ipv6: clear RA flags when adding a static route
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/f72514b3c569
- [2/2,net-next,v2] selftests: fib_tests: add fib6 from ra to static test
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/d7dbda878920
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-19 3:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-15 9:59 [PATCH 1/2 net-next v2] ipv6: clear RA flags when adding a static route Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2025-11-15 9:59 ` [PATCH 2/2 net-next v2] selftests: fib_tests: add fib6 from ra to static test Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2025-11-19 2:56 ` [PATCH 1/2 net-next v2] ipv6: clear RA flags when adding a static route David Ahern
2025-11-19 3:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
2025-12-10 15:55 ` Uwe Kleine-König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=176352302649.209489.15960953294481237254.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fmancera@suse.de \
--cc=g.djavadyan@gmail.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).